VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes Vito Transporter comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 28,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mercedes Vito Transporter?

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes Vito Transporter: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
details

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes Vito Transporter is considerably cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,546 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers substantially more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 414 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Vito Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers marginally more torque with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is slightly lighter – 1,916 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries noticeably more – 884 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 234 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Vito Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,800
Vito Transporter

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 304 - 474 km
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes Vito Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Mercedes Vito Transporter

The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.

details
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes Vito Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 222 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
7
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,928 mm
Height
-
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
547 - 884 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.