What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 1.60 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 61 km.

How fast can the Mazda CX-80 go?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches up to 219 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

How big is the Mazda CX-80 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 is 4995 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1714 mm high.

Is the Nissan X-Trail offered with different drivetrains?

The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Nissan X-Trail's engine?

Up to 213 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Nissan X-Trail in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.70 L.

What maximum speed does the Nissan X-Trail reach?

The Nissan X-Trail reaches up to 200 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Nissan X-Trail?

Depending on configuration, up to 585 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Nissan X-Trail?

The Nissan X-Trail measures 4680 mm long, 1840 mm wide and 1720 mm high.

Mazda CX-80 vs Nissan X-Trail – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan X-Trail has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34000 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 14186 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.10 L per 100 km.

X-Trail @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Nissan X-Trail tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls slight stronger with 550 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is clearly perceptible lighter – 1668 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 463 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers significantly more room – 585 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 327 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs noticeable better – up to 1971 L, which is about 547 L more than the Nissan X-Trail.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 slightly takes the win – 650 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Reviews Nissan X-Trail

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …

@ Kia Corporation

Kia Sportage

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan X-Trail

VS

In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Kia Sportage and Nissan X-Trail emerge as standout contenders, each offering a unique blend of style, comfort, and innovation. The Sportage impresses with its bold design and advanced tech features, while the X-Trail is praised for its practicality and …

Costs and Consumption
Price 48200 - 60200 £	Price 34000 - 50400 £
Consumption L/100km 1.6 - 5.8 L	Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 61 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 35 - 151 g/km	co2 131 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 70 - 74 L	Fuel tank capacity 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 7	Seats 5 - 7
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg	Curb weight 1668 - 1961 kg
Trunk capacity 258 L	Trunk capacity 177 - 585 L
Length 4995 mm	Length 4680 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1840 mm
Height 1714 mm	Height 1720 mm
Max trunk capacity 1971 L	Max trunk capacity 1396 - 1424 L
Payload 649 - 650 kg	Payload 432 - 574 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 254 - 327 HP	Power HP 163 - 213 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7 - 9.6 s
Max Speed 195 - 219 km/h	Max Speed 170 - 200 km/h
Torque 500 - 550 Nm	Torque 300 - 525 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 3
Power kW 187 - 241 kW	Power kW 120 - 157 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 1497 cm3