Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Nissan X-Trail - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (327 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (49300 £ vs 34200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Nissan X-Trail?
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan X-Trail has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15171 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 4 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.
X-Trail
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls slight stronger with 550 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is clearly perceptible lighter – 1668 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 463 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers significantly more room – 585 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 327 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 slightly takes the win – 650 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda CX-80
Nissan X-Trail
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Nissan X-Trail
4.6 (5 Reviews)
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
Mazda CX-80
Nissan X-Trail
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49300 - 61400 £
|
Price
34200 - 50500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
Curb weight
1668 - 1961 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1840 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?
The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.