Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Nissan X-Trail comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 213 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Nissan X-Trail?
Mazda CX-80 vs Nissan X-Trail: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan X-Trail is considerably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,171 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.
X-Trail
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers barely more torque with 550 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is visibly lighter – 1,668 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 463 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers substantially more boot space – 585 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 327 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries somewhat more – 650 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Mazda CX-80
Nissan X-Trail
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Nissan X-Trail
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
Mazda CX-80
Nissan X-Trail
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.