VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?

Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,155 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers considerably more range – reaching up to 284 km, about 224 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Kangoo Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 205 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 5.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is visibly lighter – 1,639 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 492 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries visibly more – 901 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 251 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details
r221168p
r221165p
r221166p
r221163p
r221155p
r221162p

Reviews Renault Kangoo Compact Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Dacia Duster
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
VS
Dacia Duster and Renault Kangoo Compact Van go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Dacia …
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
VS
Mercedes Citan Transporter and Renault Kangoo Compact Van go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLB
VS
Mazda CX-80 and Mercedes GLB go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the …
Mazda CX-80
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
7
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
670 - 901 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.