VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Epiq comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 211 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 22,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Skoda Epiq?

Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Epiq: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Epiq

  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • markedly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Epiq is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,128 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Epiq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 440 km, about 380 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Epiq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 211 HP. That’s roughly 116 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Skoda Epiq takes 7.1 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Epiq is markedly lighter – 1,625 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 506 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Epiq offers substantially more boot space – 475 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 217 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 195 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Epiq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,200
Epiq

Skoda Epiq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 211 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 310 - 440 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the Skoda Elroq and the Skoda Epiq helps you weigh practical, compact crossover usability against a more spacious, tech-focused alternative from Skoda. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, efficiency, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the one that fits your needs.
CUPRA Raval
Skoda Epiq
VS
The Cupra Raval vs Skoda Epiq comparison places a sporty, driver-focused compact crossover against a sensible, practical contender aimed at everyday usability. I’ll break down performance, interior quality, technology and running costs so you can decide which one fits your priorities.
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Epiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Epiq

The Skoda Epiq is a sensible, well-packaged compact SUV that delivers a roomy cabin, practical storage and an easygoing driving character suited to everyday life. It prioritizes comfort and value with smart, user-friendly features rather than flashy performance.

details
113_skoda_epiq_58690d36-1920x1280
114_skoda_epiq_ff280ddc-1920x1281
040_skoda_epiq_dd6d8412-1920x1281
036_skoda_epiq_dc424056-1920x1440
041_skoda_epiq_9207c105-1920x1281
042_skoda_epiq_8c0688b5-1920x1457
048_skoda_epiq_8179f162-1920x1690

Reviews Skoda Epiq

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.Polo
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the VW ID. Polo and the Skoda Epiq to help you decide which one fits your driving needs and budget. I’ll cut through the spec sheets and focus on real-world driving, interior space, tech and running costs so you can pick with confidence.
Kia EV2
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Kia EV2 and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a more refined, family-friendly driving experience. I’ll compare the key points—range and charging, interior space, features and running costs—so you can see which one fits your …
VW ID.3
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Epiq pits two compact electric hatchbacks against each other: both suit city drivers and small families but prioritise different strengths. The ID.3 leans toward a refined, tech-focused driving experience, while the Epiq emphasises practical space, clever packaging and …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you want compact, city-friendly practicality or a more modern, feature-focused package. This brief comparison highlights the key differences in space, efficiency, tech and driving character so you can decide which suits your …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Renault R4
Skoda Epiq
VS
This comparison pits the Renault R4 against the Skoda Epiq, helping you choose between Renault’s compact, characterful offering and Skoda’s modern, tech-focused alternative. I’ll focus on the things that matter in real ownership—space, driving feel, efficiency and running costs—so you can see which …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Epiq
VS
Skoda Fabia and Skoda Epiq go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Fabia or the Skoda …
MG MG4 Urban
Skoda Epiq
VS
MG MG4 Urban and Skoda Epiq go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MG MG4 Urban or the Skoda …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Epiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
22,200 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
310 - 440 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,625 - 1,642 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
475 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
438 - 455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
116 - 211 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
267 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
85 - 155 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.