Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs SsangYong Korando comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or SsangYong Korando?
Mazda CX-80 vs SsangYong Korando: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SsangYong Korando is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,337 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Korando with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the SsangYong Korando offers substantially more range – reaching up to 339 km, about 279 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Korando
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 137 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the SsangYong Korando takes 8.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers markedly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Korando is significantly lighter – 1,517 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 614 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Korando offers substantially more boot space – 551 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 293 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 187 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Mazda CX-80
SsangYong Korando
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
SsangYong Korando
The SsangYong Korando pairs bold, modern styling with a surprisingly roomy and practical cabin, so it looks confident at the lights and handles the daily grind without fuss. It swaps flashy badges for honest value, offering a composed ride, useful equipment and wallet-friendly running that make it an appealing pick for buyers who'd rather spend on weekends than on extravagant finance packages.
details
Mazda CX-80
SsangYong Korando
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
27,000 - 42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 8.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
339 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
0 - 197 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,840 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
551 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,450 - 4,465 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,620 - 1,645 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,248 L
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
410 - 463 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
156 - 191 km/h
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.