Is the Lexus RX offered with different drivetrains?

The Lexus RX is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Lexus RX?

The Lexus RX reaches a peak output of 371 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the Lexus RX use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 1.10 L.

What is the electric driving range of the Lexus RX?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 68 km.

What is the Lexus RX’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 461 L fit inside.

What are the Lexus RX’s length, width and height?

Length 4890 mm, width 1920 mm, height 1695 mm – those are the dimensions of the Lexus RX.

What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 4 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 60 km.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

Lexus RX vs Mazda CX-80 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

RX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49300 £ , while the Lexus RX costs 63500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14186 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lexus RX manages with 1.10 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L. The difference is about 2.90 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Lexus RX performs slightly better – achieving up to 68 km, about 8 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lexus RX has a a bit edge – offering 371 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 44 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus RX is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 6.20 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Lexus RX pulls slight stronger with 551 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 1 Nm difference.

RX

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Lexus RX is minimal lighter – 2040 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 91 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Lexus RX offers clearly more room – 461 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 203 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 minimal takes the win – 650 kg compared to 620 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Lexus RX shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Lexus RX

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-80

Toyota Highlander

VS

In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …

Mazda CX-80

VW Tayron

VS

In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …

Costs and Consumption
Price 63500 - 84700 £	Price 49300 - 61400 £
Consumption L/100km 1.1 - 8 L	Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 68 km	Electric Range 60 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 25 - 182 g/km	co2 91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 55 - 65 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 7
Doors 5	Doors -
Curb weight 2040 - 2185 kg	Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity 461 L	Trunk capacity 258 L
Length 4890 mm	Length -
Width 1920 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height 1695 mm	Height -
Max trunk capacity 1678 L	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 575 - 620 kg	Payload 649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail CVT, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 250 - 371 HP	Power HP 254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.2 - 7.9 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed 200 - 210 km/h	Max Speed -
Torque 551 Nm	Torque 500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Power kW 184 - 273 kW	Power kW 187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity 2393 - 2487 cm3	Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3