@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Toyota Land Cruiser – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-80 or Toyota Land Cruiser fits your lifestyle better.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Tale of Two Titans: Mazda CX-80 vs Toyota Land Cruiser

When it comes to the world of SUVs and off-roaders, few names evoke as much admiration as Mazda and Toyota. In our latest comparison, we pit the balanced prowess of the Mazda CX-80 against the rugged determination of the Toyota Land Cruiser. Both exemplifying their respective brand's heritage, they promise performance, innovation, and distinct driving experiences. Let's delve into the details to discern which car captivates your automotive soul.

Land Cruiser @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance

The Mazda CX-80 offers a choice between a Plug-in Hybrid and a Diesel Mild-Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engine, allowing drivers to prioritize eco-friendliness or traditional power. With engines boasting up to 327 horsepower and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 6.8 seconds, the CX-80 is made for those who appreciate swift responsiveness. The top speed of 219 km/h further emphasizes its on-road vigor.

In contrast, the Toyota Land Cruiser keeps things simple yet powerful with its 205 horsepower diesel engine, delivering a solid 500 Nm of torque. While it doesn't match the acceleration of the CX-80, reaching its top speed at 170 km/h, the Land Cruiser is designed for durability and off-road resilience, making it ideal for adventurers who crave the path less traveled.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Efficiency and Sustainability

Mazda's innovative approach is evident in the CX-80's fuel consumption figures. The Plug-in Hybrid boasts an impressive 1.6 L/100 km and a 60 km fully electric range, positioning it as a leader in efficiency. Its CO2 emissions are considerably low, ranging from 35 to 148 g/km, making it more environment-friendly.

The Land Cruiser, built for rugged terrains, records a higher fuel consumption at 10.3 L/100 km with CO2 emissions of 272 g/km. While these figures highlight its traditional off-road character, Toyota enthusiasts value its time-tested reliability over fuel savings.

Land Cruiser @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Space and Practicality

The Mazda CX-80 offers a comfortable seven-seat configuration within its 4995 mm length. With a trunk capacity of 258 liters, it caters more to family-oriented adventures with a balanced attention to luxury and utility.

The Land Cruiser stands tall at 1935 mm in height, with a 4925 mm length and a commanding road presence. Although configured for five passengers, its 742-liter trunk capacity underscores its practicality for carrying substantial gear, a boon for frequent travelers and explorers.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Technological Innovations

Mazda's CX-80 exemplifies cutting-edge technology, with its hybrid systems and advanced safety features. The integration of an automatic gearbox enhances its driving ease, ensuring a seamless transition between city roads and open highways.

The Land Cruiser, with its automatic transmission, emphasizes long-haul reliability and mechanical simplicity. Its robust build is complemented by the Toyota brand's legendary durability and a design DNA fine-tuned over decades.

Land Cruiser @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Mazda CX-80 and the Toyota Land Cruiser depends largely on your lifestyle and driving needs. The CX-80, with its modern hybrid technology and fuel efficiency, is built for the eco-conscious driver who demands performance. If your pursuits involve off-the-beaten-path explorations and supreme reliability, the Land Cruiser is your steadfast companion.

Ultimately, each vehicle symbolizes its brand's philosophy, catering to a unique set of automotive desires. Whether you opt for the sophistication of Mazda or the ruggedness of Toyota, the choice is bound to thrill and inspire.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Toyota Land Cruiser costs 70700 £. That’s a price difference of around 22491 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Toyota Land Cruiser with 10.60 L. The difference is about 9 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Toyota Land Cruiser takes 12.30 s. That’s about 5.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs noticeable better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Toyota Land Cruiser tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 49 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls slight stronger with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is clearly perceptible lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2610 kg. The difference is around 479 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Toyota Land Cruiser offers convincingly more room – 742 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 484 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs minimal better – up to 1971 L, which is about 76 L more than the Toyota Land Cruiser.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 to a small extent takes the win – 650 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,200
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details

Toyota Land Cruiser

The Toyota Land Cruiser is renowned for its robust durability and exceptional off-road capabilities. Its design combines a rugged exterior with a comfortable and functional interior, appealing to both adventure seekers and city drivers. The vehicle's reliability and advanced technology make it a popular choice for those who require a dependable SUV that can handle a variety of terrains with ease.

details
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Land Cruiser
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Land Cruiser @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
48200 - 60200 £
Price
70700 - 79300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
10.6 - 10.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
61 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 151 g/km
co2
278 - 284 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
7
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
2610 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
143 - 742 L
Length
4995 mm
Length
4925 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1980 mm
Height
1714 mm
Height
1935 mm
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Max trunk capacity
1829 - 1895 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
540 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.30 s
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
170 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
151 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
2755 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.