VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Toyota Land Cruiser - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (327 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (49300 £ vs 70700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Toyota Land Cruiser?

CX-80

Tale of Two Titans: Mazda CX-80 vs Toyota Land Cruiser

When it comes to the world of SUVs and off-roaders, few names evoke as much admiration as Mazda and Toyota. In our latest comparison, we pit the balanced prowess of the Mazda CX-80 against the rugged determination of the Toyota Land Cruiser. Both exemplifying their respective brand's heritage, they promise performance, innovation, and distinct driving experiences. Let's delve into the details to discern which car captivates your automotive soul.

Land Cruiser

Engine and Performance

The Mazda CX-80 offers a choice between a Plug-in Hybrid and a Diesel Mild-Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engine, allowing drivers to prioritize eco-friendliness or traditional power. With engines boasting up to 327 horsepower and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 6.8 seconds, the CX-80 is made for those who appreciate swift responsiveness. The top speed of 219 km/h further emphasizes its on-road vigor.

In contrast, the Toyota Land Cruiser keeps things simple yet powerful with its 205 horsepower diesel engine, delivering a solid 500 Nm of torque. While it doesn't match the acceleration of the CX-80, reaching its top speed at 170 km/h, the Land Cruiser is designed for durability and off-road resilience, making it ideal for adventurers who crave the path less traveled.

CX-80

Efficiency and Sustainability

Mazda's innovative approach is evident in the CX-80's fuel consumption figures. The Plug-in Hybrid boasts an impressive 1.6 L/100 km and a 60 km fully electric range, positioning it as a leader in efficiency. Its CO2 emissions are considerably low, ranging from 35 to 148 g/km, making it more environment-friendly.

The Land Cruiser, built for rugged terrains, records a higher fuel consumption at 10.3 L/100 km with CO2 emissions of 272 g/km. While these figures highlight its traditional off-road character, Toyota enthusiasts value its time-tested reliability over fuel savings.

Land Cruiser

Space and Practicality

The Mazda CX-80 offers a comfortable seven-seat configuration within its 4995 mm length. With a trunk capacity of 258 liters, it caters more to family-oriented adventures with a balanced attention to luxury and utility.

The Land Cruiser stands tall at 1935 mm in height, with a 4925 mm length and a commanding road presence. Although configured for five passengers, its 742-liter trunk capacity underscores its practicality for carrying substantial gear, a boon for frequent travelers and explorers.

CX-80

Technological Innovations

Mazda's CX-80 exemplifies cutting-edge technology, with its hybrid systems and advanced safety features. The integration of an automatic gearbox enhances its driving ease, ensuring a seamless transition between city roads and open highways.

The Land Cruiser, with its automatic transmission, emphasizes long-haul reliability and mechanical simplicity. Its robust build is complemented by the Toyota brand's legendary durability and a design DNA fine-tuned over decades.

Land Cruiser

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Mazda CX-80 and the Toyota Land Cruiser depends largely on your lifestyle and driving needs. The CX-80, with its modern hybrid technology and fuel efficiency, is built for the eco-conscious driver who demands performance. If your pursuits involve off-the-beaten-path explorations and supreme reliability, the Land Cruiser is your steadfast companion.

Ultimately, each vehicle symbolizes its brand's philosophy, catering to a unique set of automotive desires. Whether you opt for the sophistication of Mazda or the ruggedness of Toyota, the choice is bound to thrill and inspire.

Mazda CX-80

Toyota Land Cruiser

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49300 £ , while the Toyota Land Cruiser costs 70700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21377 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 4 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Toyota Land Cruiser with 10.60 L. The difference is about 6.60 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Toyota Land Cruiser takes 12.30 s. That’s about 5.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls slight stronger with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is clearly perceptible lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2610 kg. The difference is around 479 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Toyota Land Cruiser offers convincingly more room – 742 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 484 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 to a small extent takes the win – 650 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-80
Toyota Land Cruiser

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Toyota Land Cruiser

The Toyota Land Cruiser is the kind of SUV that makes you feel ready to abandon the map and take the long way home, with legendary go-anywhere capability wrapped in reassuringly solid build quality. Inside it's surprisingly comfortable and grown-up — a practical luxury for buyers who want reliability and presence rather than fleeting flash.

details
2025_Toyota_Land_Cruiser_002
2025_Toyota_LandCruiser_1958_MeteorShower_002
2025_Toyota_Land_Cruiser_014

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Reviews Toyota Land Cruiser

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Land Cruiser

Costs and Consumption
Price
49300 - 61400 £
Price
70700 - 79300 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
10.6 - 10.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
278 - 284 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
7
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
2610 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
143 - 742 L
Length
-
Length
4925 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1980 mm
Height
-
Height
1935 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1829 - 1895 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
540 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.30 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
170 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
151 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
2755 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Toyota Hilux
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
When comparing the Toyota Hilux and the Toyota Land Cruiser, it’s clear that both vehicles cater to different needs within the off-road segment. The Hilux boasts impressive durability and versatility, making it a favorite for those seeking a robust workhorse, while the Land Cruiser offers …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
The Ford Ranger and Toyota Land Cruiser compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Kodiaq or the Toyota Land Cruiser is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
SsangYong Rexton
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
Unsure whether the SsangYong Rexton or the Toyota Land Cruiser is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.