Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda MX-30 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (170 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Mazda MX-30 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
MX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda MX-30 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,437 £.
As for electric range, the Mazda MX-30 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 85 km, about 18 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers markedly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
MX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is only slightly lighter – 1,792 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 57 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers visibly more boot space – 472 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries visibly more – 600 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 198 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda MX-30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £30,800
Mazda MX-30
Mazda MX-30
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda MX-30
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Mazda MX-30
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
22 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,849 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
1,555 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.