Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Peugeot 3008 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (325 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (35100 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 3008 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
3008
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Peugeot 3008 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35100 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8143 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 3008 manages with 2.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 3008 performs significantly better – achieving up to 698 km, about 638 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 3008 has a to a small extent edge – offering 325 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 3008 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Peugeot 3008 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls minimal stronger with 540 Nm compared to 511 Nm. That’s about 29 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
3008
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot 3008 is slight lighter – 1648 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 144 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Peugeot 3008 offers barely noticeable more room – 520 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 48 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 3008 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1480 L, which is about 324 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque noticeable takes the win – 600 kg compared to 467 kg. That’s a difference of about 133 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot 3008 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Peugeot 3008
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £35,100
Peugeot 3008
Peugeot 3008
3.6 (2 Reviews)
The Peugeot 3008 blends bold French styling with a surprisingly grown-up interior that makes even dull commutes feel a little bit special. Practical enough for family life yet lively to drive, it’s a clever all‑rounder that stands out from the crossover crowd without shouting for attention.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Peugeot 3008
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35100 - 52000 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 - 17.6 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
81 - 698 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 96.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1648 - 2266 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
470 - 520 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4542 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1895 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1641 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1430 - 1480 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
432 - 467 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 220 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Peugeot 3008?
The Peugeot 3008 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.