VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Lynk & Co 02 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 30,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Lynk & Co 02?

Mazda MX-30 vs Lynk & Co 02: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
details

Lynk & Co 02

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda MX-30 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Lynk & Co 02 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 17.1 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 1.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 445 km, about 360 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

02

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is only slightly lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 1,895 kg. The difference is around 46 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lynk & Co 02 offers slightly more boot space – 410 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda MX-30 carries very slightly more – 402 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,900
02

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 435 - 445 km
details

Frequently compared as well

ZEEKR X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
We’re squaring off the ZEEKR X against the Lynk & Co 02 to find which compact crossover delivers the best blend of design, tech and real-world usability. Expect sparks in the handling department from the ZEEKR and everyday cleverness from the 02 — the question is which one fits your driveway and …
Lynk & Co 02
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lynk & Co 02 and the Toyota C‑HR go head-to-head as compact crossovers that blend urban-friendly dimensions with bold styling. I'll compare the 02 and the Toyota C‑HR across design, driving feel, practicality and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Mazda MX-30
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details
serpimg_8xULuL

Reviews Lynk & Co 02

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
LUIS
7 Jul 2026, 10:24:27

It's a very well-finished and aesthetically attractive car, very high-performing, but one in which the suspension doesn't match the performance delivered by its engine. In the Core version it has fairly restrained fuel consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lynk & Co 02
Leapmotor B10
VS
Lynk & Co 02 and Leapmotor B10 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Lynk & Co 02 or the …
BYD Atto 3
Lynk & Co 02
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the BYD Atto 3 and the Lynk & Co 02 showcase distinct advantages catering to diverse segments of electric vehicle enthusiasts. The BYD Atto 3 impresses with its advanced battery technology and a spacious interior that promises comfort for family drives. Meanwhile, the …
BMW iX1
Lynk & Co 02
VS
BMW iX1 and Lynk & Co 02 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW iX1 or the Lynk & Co 02 …
Hyundai Kona
Mazda MX-30
VS
Hyundai Kona and Mazda MX-30 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Hyundai Kona or the Mazda …
Omoda 5
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Omoda 5 and Lynk & Co 02 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the Lynk & Co 02 …
Toyota bZ4X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Toyota bZ4X and Lynk & Co 02 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Toyota bZ4X or the Lynk & …
Volvo EX30
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Lynk & Co 02 offer compelling options in the compact crossover market, each bringing unique attributes to discerning drivers. The Volvo EX30 emphasizes Scandinavian elegance and cutting-edge safety features, while the Lynk & Co 02 boasts striking design and connectivity-focused …
Lynk & Co 02
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Lynk & Co 02 and MG MGS5 EV go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Lynk & Co 02 or the MG …
Mazda MX-30
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,895 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,845 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
375 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
323 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Lynk & Co
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.