VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Lynk & Co 02 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (204 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (33400 £ vs 30900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Lynk & Co 02?

Atto 3

BYD Atto 3 vs. Lynk & Co 02: Electric SUVs in the Spotlight

In the ever-evolving world of electric vehicles, the demand for innovative and efficient SUVs is burgeoning. Two formidable players in this domain are the BYD Atto 3 and the Lynk & Co 02. Both of these vehicles offer a glimpse into the future of sustainable driving with their cutting-edge technology and impressive capabilities. While they share some similarities, each has unique features that set them apart. This article delves into the details of these electric powerhouses to guide prospective drivers.

Atto 3

Sleek Designs and Dimensions

The BYD Atto 3 and the Lynk & Co 02 both belong to the SUV category. With the Atto 3 measuring 4455 mm in length, 1875 mm in width, and 1615 mm in height, it presents a robust and commanding presence on the road. The Lynk & Co 02 is marginally longer at 4460 mm, though slightly narrower and lower, at 1845 mm wide and 1573 mm tall. Both vehicles comfortably accommodate five passengers and offer a trunk capacity of 440 liters, ensuring ample space for storage.

Atto 3

Power and Performance

The heart of any electric vehicle lies in its engine and drivetrain capabilities. The BYD Atto 3 features a front-wheel-drive system powered by an electric motor that delivers 204 HP (150 kW) and 310 Nm of torque. It accelerates from 0-100 km/h in a respectable 7.3 seconds, with a maximum speed of 160 km/h.

On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 02 boasts a rear-wheel-drive setup, generating a more substantial 272 HP (200 kW) and 343 Nm of torque. It surpasses the Atto 3 in acceleration, reaching 0-100 km/h in just 5.5 seconds and achieving a top speed of 180 km/h. The difference in drive configuration may appeal to various driving preferences, offering a choice between the more traditional front-wheel-drive and the dynamic rear-wheel-drive experience.

Atto 3

Range and Efficiency

Electric range is a critical consideration for prospective EV owners. The BYD Atto 3 offers an electric range of 420 km and has a consumption rate of 16 kWh/100 km, making it an efficient option for daily commutes and long journeys alike.

The Lynk & Co 02 edges ahead slightly in terms of range, offering between 435 km and 445 km, depending on the model variant, with consumption figures ranging from 17.1 to 17.6 kWh/100 km. This slight advantage may attract those looking for extra assurance on longer trips.

Atto 3

Weight and Payload

Weight and payload are crucial factors influencing an SUV's overall performance and utility. The Atto 3 has a curb weight of 1825 kg and can carry a payload of 335 kg. Conversely, the Lynk & Co 02 is slightly lighter, weighing in at 1820 kg, yet it impresses with a higher payload capacity of 450 kg, providing additional utility for activities that require more load.

Conclusion: Choosing Your Electric Companion

Both the BYD Atto 3 and Lynk & Co 02 represent excellent options in the electric SUV market, each bringing something distinct to the table. The Atto 3 provides a well-rounded package with its efficiency and front-wheel-drive system, ideal for those seeking balance and reliability.

The Lynk & Co 02 stands out with its superior power, rear-wheel drive, and slightly better range, catering to drivers who prioritize performance and agility. Making a choice between these two comes down to individual preferences and lifestyle needs, but either way, you'll be investing in a future-forward, environmentally conscious vehicle that represents the vanguard of automotive technology.

BYD Atto 3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Lynk & Co 02

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Lynk & Co 02 has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30900 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 33400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2568 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the BYD Atto 3: with 16 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Lynk & Co 02 with 17.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.10 kWh.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 performs minimal better – achieving up to 445 km, about 25 km more than the BYD Atto 3.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 has a noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the BYD Atto 3 takes 7.30 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Lynk & Co 02 performs somewhat better – reaching 180 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 02 pulls slight stronger with 323 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is slight lighter – 1825 kg compared to 1895 kg. The difference is around 70 kg.

In terms of boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers minimal more room – 440 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Lynk & Co 02 performs minimal better – up to 1349 L, which is about 11 L more than the BYD Atto 3.

When it comes to payload, Lynk & Co 02 somewhat takes the win – 375 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

BYD Atto 3
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £30,900
default

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.1 - 17.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 435 - 445 km
details

BYD Atto 3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Lynk & Co 02

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details

Reviews BYD Atto 3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Lynk & Co 02

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
In the battle of BYD's innovative electric vehicles, the Atto 3 emerges as a more advanced contender compared to the Atto 2. With its sleek design, improved range, and enhanced technology features, the Atto 3 not only offers better performance but also caters to the growing demand for eco-friendly …
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Lynk & Co 01 and Lynk & Co 02 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
BYD Atto 3
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption
Price
33400 - 35100 £
Price
30900 - 34300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh
Electric Range
420 km
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1825 kg
Curb weight
1895 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
4455 mm
Length
4460 mm
Width
1875 mm
Width
1845 mm
Height
1615 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1338 L
Max trunk capacity
1349 L
Payload
335 kg
Payload
375 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.30 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.50 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
310 Nm
Torque
323 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
Lynk & Co

Similar Comparisons

BYD Atto 3
Skoda Elroq
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the BYD Atto 3 showcases its impressive range and advanced technology features, appealing to eco-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq impresses with its spacious interior and refined handling, making it a strong contender for families. Both electric SUVs …
BYD Atto 3
XPeng G6
VS
Unsure whether the BYD Atto 3 or the XPeng G6 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
BYD Atto 3
BYD Seal U
VS
If you want a friendly, practical EV that looks like it drinks coffee in a hipster cafe and carries everything from groceries to weekend bikes, the BYD Atto 3 is the sensible, value-packed choice. The BYD Seal U, by contrast, dresses up the electric experience with sleeker lines, sharper handling …
Volvo EX30
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Lynk & Co 02 offer compelling options in the compact crossover market, each bringing unique attributes to discerning drivers. The Volvo EX30 emphasizes Scandinavian elegance and cutting-edge safety features, while the Lynk & Co 02 boasts striking design and connectivity-focused …
BYD Atto 3
Ford Explorer EV
VS
In the burgeoning landscape of electric vehicles, the BYD Atto 3 and the Ford Explorer EV offer compelling choices for eco-conscious consumers. The BYD Atto 3 impresses with its sleek design, compact size, and advanced technology features, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Dolphin
VS
In the growing electric vehicle market, the BYD Atto 3 emerges as a standout compact SUV, offering a spacious interior and advanced tech features that cater to urban drivers. In contrast, the BYD Dolphin, a sleek hatchback, emphasizes efficiency and agility, making it an excellent choice for those …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD Atto 3
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q4 e-tron or the BYD Atto 3 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
BYD Atto 3
MG MG5
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and MG MG5 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the BYD Atto 3?

The BYD Atto 3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.