VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Mercedes EQE SUV comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 625 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 71,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Mercedes EQE SUV?

Mazda MX-30 vs Mercedes EQE SUV: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

Mercedes EQE SUV

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda MX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Mercedes EQE SUV costs 71,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,705 £.

When it comes to electricity consumption, both models perform equally – each averaging 18.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers considerably more range – reaching up to 611 km, about 526 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

EQE SUV

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers considerably more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 455 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE SUV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 5.4 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mercedes EQE SUV is clearly faster – reaching 240 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 100 km/h.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is markedly lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,440 kg. The difference is around 591 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers noticeably more boot space – 520 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 170 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,675 L, about 520 L more than the Mazda MX-30.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQE SUV carries visibly more – 580 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 178 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQE SUV is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £71,600
EQE SUV

Mercedes EQE SUV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 265 - 625 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 453 - 611 km
Mazda MX-30
Mercedes EQE SUV

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details

Mercedes EQE SUV

The Mercedes EQE SUV wraps silent electric power in a sumptuous, tech-filled shell, offering a cocoon-like cabin that makes long journeys feel indulgent. It’s not a driver's toy but a sophisticated cruiser for buyers who want luxury, space and futuristic gadgetry without shouting for attention.

details
Mazda MX-30
Mercedes EQE SUV

Costs and Consumption

Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
71,600 - 125,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
453 - 611 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
2,440 - 2,615 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
520 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
4,863 - 4,879 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,940 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
1,672 - 1,685 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
1,675 L
Payload
402 kg
Payload
505 - 580 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.