VS

Mazda MX-30 vs MINI Aceman comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or MINI Aceman?

Mazda MX-30 vs MINI Aceman: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more trunk space
details

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MINI Aceman is slightly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,848 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 4.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the MINI Aceman offers considerably more range – reaching up to 355 km, about 270 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

Aceman

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers markedly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is barely lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 129 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda MX-30 offers a bit more boot space – 350 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries visibly more – 530 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 128 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 309 - 355 km
Mazda MX-30
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
Mazda MX-30
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
300 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,754 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
450 - 530 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
MINI
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.