Compare performance (170 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Nissan Interstar?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda MX-30 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,311 £.
As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers substantially more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 325 km more than the Mazda MX-30.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
Both models deliver identical power – 170 HP each.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda MX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is a bit lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 204 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries substantially more – 1,447 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,045 kg.
The Nissan Interstar holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
detailsThe Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
22 g/km
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,849 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
1,555 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|