VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Renault Twingo comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Renault Twingo?

Mazda MX-30 vs Renault Twingo: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

Renault Twingo

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Twingo is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,791 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Twingo is markedly more efficient: consuming 13.1 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 5.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Twingo offers considerably more range – reaching up to 262 km, about 177 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

Twingo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers clearly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda MX-30 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 9.1 s, while the Renault Twingo takes 12.1 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda MX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Twingo is significantly lighter – 1,275 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 574 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda MX-30 offers somewhat more boot space – 350 L compared to 305 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda MX-30 carries markedly more – 402 kg compared to 320 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Twingo is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Twingo

Renault Twingo

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 82 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 260 - 262 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Dolphin Surf
Renault Twingo
VS
We pit the cheeky BYD Dolphin Surf against the compact Renault Twingo to find out which small car deserves your city-driving crown. The Dolphin Surf brings electric refinement and modern tech to the party, while the Twingo trades on nimble handling and fuss-free simplicity — your choice depends on …
Renault R5
Renault Twingo
VS
Deciding between the Renault 5 and the Renault Twingo comes down to whether you prefer the retro-inspired style and modern reinterpretation of the 5 or the Twingo’s proven compact practicality. This comparison focuses on driving character, interior space, running costs and everyday usability to …
Mazda MX-30
Renault Twingo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Twingo

The Renault Twingo is a cheeky city car that turns tight streets and impossible parking spaces into an urban playground with its agile handling and compact footprint. It’s perfect for zipping around town thanks to clever interior packaging and a playful character, though buyers chasing long-distance comfort or huge luggage space should consider other options.

details
serpimg_jX1Asw

Reviews Renault Twingo

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Otto
24 May 2026, 14:36:22

Great car, my wife loves it! 3 years, zero problems!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
eb
18 Apr 2026, 11:35:24

A nice little 5‑CV petrol car that, unfortunately, is no longer sold new.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Inster
Renault Twingo
VS
City-car showdown: the Hyundai Inster goes head-to-head with the Renault Twingo in a battle of practicality, personality and pocket-friendly running costs. We test them in real-world city conditions — parking, commute, cabin comfort and ownership — so you can pick the best small car for urban life.
Renault Twingo
Leapmotor T03
VS
The Renault Twingo and the Leapmotor T03 are both aimed at city drivers but represent different philosophies: the Twingo sticks to compact, petrol-powered simplicity and agility, while the T03 is an affordable electric newcomer focused on efficiency and modern tech. Choose the Twingo if you want …
Dacia Spring
Renault Twingo
VS
Small, affordable and built for city life, the Dacia Spring and Renault Twingo offer two different takes on electric urban transport. This comparison cuts through the specs to show how they differ in range, interior space, driving character and ownership costs so you can choose the better fit.
Fiat Panda
Renault Twingo
VS
Choosing between the Fiat Panda and the Renault Twingo is basically a choice between roomy, practical versatility and compact, city-focused agility. I’ll walk you through how they stack up on space, comfort, driving feel and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Nissan Micra
Renault Twingo
VS
The Nissan Micra and Renault Twingo compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Citroen C3
Renault Twingo
VS
The Citroen C3 and Renault Twingo compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Renault Clio
Renault Twingo
VS
Unsure whether the Renault Clio or the Renault Twingo is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Twingo
VW ID.Polo
VS
Renault Twingo and VW ID.Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda MX-30
Renault Twingo

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
17,100 - 18,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
260 - 262 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,275 - 1,294 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
305 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,720 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
301 - 320 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
175 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
60 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.