VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?

Mazda MX-30 vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

  • markedly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • markedly lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Toyota Proace City Compact Van is markedly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,495 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mazda MX-30 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 18.3 kWh/100km compared to 18.5 kWh/100km for the Toyota Proace City Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 0.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers considerably more range – reaching up to 337 km, about 252 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

Proace City Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers moderately more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda MX-30 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.1 s, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van takes 11.1 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is markedly lighter – 1,358 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 491 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van carries clearly more – 921 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 519 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,400
Proace City Compact Van

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 337 km
Mazda MX-30
Toyota Proace City Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.

details
Mazda MX-30
Toyota Proace City Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
22,400 - 37,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
337 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 - 149 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,358 - 1,837 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
560 - 921 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.