Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes C-Class EQ vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (489 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (58,000 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes C-Class EQ or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Mercedes C-Class EQ vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
C-Class EQ
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is markedly cheaper – starting at 43,300 £ , while the Mercedes C-Class EQ costs 58,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,753 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers substantially more range – reaching up to 753 km, about 686 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers clearly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 220 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C-Class EQ is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes C-Class EQ delivers clearly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.
C-Class EQ
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly lighter – 1,792 kg compared to 2,460 kg. The difference is around 668 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers marginally more boot space – 472 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 2 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries moderately more – 600 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes C-Class EQ is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £58,000
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes C-Class EQ
The Mercedes C‑Class EQ blends the familiar poise and luxury of the C‑Class with Mercedes' EQ electric ethos, delivering a quietly refined and modern driving experience. Inside, it pairs upscale materials and tech-forward touches with a composed ride that suits both city commuting and longer journeys.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
58,000 - 67,600 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
706 - 753 km
|
Electric Range
67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,460 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,892 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
489 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
800 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.