VS

Mercedes Citan Transporter vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (131 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (21,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan Transporter or Nissan Juke?

Mercedes Citan Transporter vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

Mercedes Citan Transporter

details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Citan Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Juke is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mercedes Citan Transporter costs 21,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 356 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Mercedes Citan Transporter with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke offers only slightly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Juke is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 10.1 s, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter takes 11.7 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Citan Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is barely lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,381 kg. The difference is around 107 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Citan Transporter carries significantly more – 787 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 360 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Citan Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,700
Citan Transporter

Mercedes Citan Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 131 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 262 - 290 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Ford Focus
Nissan Juke
VS
The Ford Focus and the Nissan Juke take very different approaches to the compact segment: the Focus focuses on balanced driving dynamics, practicality and refined handling, while the Juke trades conventional packaging for bold styling, higher ride height and city-friendly presence. Choose the Focus …
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes Citan Transporter

The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.

details
serpimg_jZdUe6

Reviews Mercedes Citan Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Sandero
Nissan Juke
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Nissan Juke both aim at buyers wanting compact, city-friendly cars, but they take very different approaches: the Sandero focuses on affordability and practical simplicity, while the Juke leans into distinctive styling and a more dynamic feel. This comparison will help you …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Nissan Juke
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Nissan Juke and Peugeot 2008 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving experiences. The Juke offers a sportier edge with its agile handling and bold styling, while the 2008 impresses with a refined interior and advanced technology …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Juke
VS
The Kona and the Juke are two of the most popular subcompact crossovers, each standing out with bold styling and a city-friendly footprint. This quick comparison looks at how the Kona and Juke stack up on comfort, practicality, performance and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Comparing the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris Cross helps buyers choose between two compact crossovers with different strengths: the Juke offers bold styling and a punchy, fun-to-drive character, while the Yaris Cross prioritizes refinement, efficiency and everyday practicality. I’ll walk you …
Fiat 600
Nissan Juke
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Fiat 600 and Nissan Juke showcase distinct personalities that cater to different driving preferences. While the Fiat 600 embraces retro charm paired with modern features, the Nissan Juke offers sporty aesthetics and a more robust performance profile. …
Nissan Juke
VW T-Roc
VS
Nissan Juke and VW T-Roc go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Nissan Juke or the VW T-Roc …
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,700 - 33,300 £
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 156 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,381 - 1,939 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,900 - 3,620 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 787 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Nissan
Is the Mercedes Citan Transporter offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.