Compare performance (131 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (21,700 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan Transporter or Renault Kangoo?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes Citan Transporter is somewhat cheaper – starting at 21,700 £ , while the Renault Kangoo costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,973 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Citan Transporter uses 5.1 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Renault Kangoo with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes Citan Transporter is very slightly more efficient: consuming 18.7 kWh/100km compared to 20.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Citan Transporter offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 290 km, about 5 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Citan Transporter offers barely more power – delivering 131 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.6 s, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter takes 11.7 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes Citan Transporter is markedly faster – reaching 183 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 48 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 270 Nm.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Citan Transporter is marginally lighter – 1,381 kg compared to 1,489 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Citan Transporter offers a bit more capacity – up to 3,620 L, about 570 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Citan Transporter carries clearly more – 787 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 177 kg.
The Mercedes Citan Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,700 - 33,300 £
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 156 g/km
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,381 - 1,939 kg
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,900 - 3,620 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
|
Payload
449 - 787 kg
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|