VS

Mercedes EQA vs MG Cyberster comparison

Compare performance (228 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or MG Cyberster?

Mercedes EQA vs MG Cyberster: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • significantly more trunk space
details

MG Cyberster

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mercedes EQA is noticeably cheaper – starting at 45,900 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,831 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MG Cyberster is barely more efficient: consuming 16.7 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQA. That’s a difference of about 0.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the MG Cyberster offers barely more range – reaching up to 507 km, about 31 km more than the Mercedes EQA.

Cyberster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers clearly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 282 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers considerably more torque with 725 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 335 Nm more.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mercedes EQA offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, MG Cyberster is only slightly lighter – 1,960 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 155 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQA offers significantly more boot space – 340 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 140 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQA carries considerably more – 425 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 275 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Cyberster is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,700
Cyberster

MG Cyberster

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 510 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 443 - 507 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLC
VS
Mercedes EQA and Mercedes GLC go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes EQA or the …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the battle of compact luxury, the Mercedes EQA and GLA offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. While the EQA stands out with its electric powertrain and eco-friendly appeal, the GLA retains the versatility and familiar dynamics of a traditional combustion engine. …
Mercedes EQA
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
Nöthi
27 Jul 2026, 18:41:16

Fantastic build quality and genuine premium-class feel with lots of features like distance sensors or the speed-limit sign reader — things Mercedes still brags about in the GLC even five years later...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
VW ID.5
VS
In the growing segment of electric SUVs, the Mercedes EQA stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, appealing to drivers who prioritize comfort and prestige. Meanwhile, the VW ID.5 offers a more sporty design and more spacious cargo capacity, appealing to those seeking …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Mercedes EQA
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Mercedes EQA and Skoda Enyaq, luxury meets practicality in an electrifying competition. The EQA impresses with its premium materials and advanced technology, catering to those who crave a refined driving experience, while the Enyaq stands out for its spacious …
BMW iX1
Mercedes EQA
VS
The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …
BMW iX2
Mercedes EQA
VS
Comparing the BMW iX2 and Mercedes EQA brings together two compact electric SUVs with different personalities: the iX2 favours sporty handling and driver engagement, while the EQA prioritises comfort and a polished Mercedes interior. Which suits you will come down to priorities like range, cabin …
MG Cyberster
Denza Z9GT
VS
MG Cyberster and Denza Z9GT go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MG Cyberster or the Denza …
Ford Explorer EV
Mercedes EQA
VS
In the showdown between the Ford Explorer EV and the Mercedes EQA, both models showcase impressive electric capabilities while catering to distinct markets. The Explorer EV offers a spacious, family-friendly design with advanced technology features, making it a strong contender for those seeking …
Mercedes EQA
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
476 km
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
200 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
150 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
228 HP
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
390 Nm
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
168 kW
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
MG
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.