Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQA vs Renault Mégane - Differences and prices compared
EQA
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Mégane has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35100 £, while the Mercedes EQA costs 44200 £. That’s a price difference of around 9180 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQA: with 14.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Renault Mégane with 15.40 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.
As for range, the Mercedes EQA performs slightly better – achieving up to 561 km, about 109 km more than the Renault Mégane.
Mégane
@ Renault Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA has a evident edge – offering 292 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 74 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Renault Mégane takes 7.40 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the performs better – reaching , while the tops out at . The difference is around .
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQA pulls convincingly stronger with 520 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm difference.
EQA
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Renault Mégane is slightly lighter – 1719 kg compared to 2045 kg. The difference is around 326 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Mégane offers slightly more room – 389 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 49 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Mégane performs slight better – up to 1332 L, which is about 12 L more than the Mercedes EQA.
When it comes to payload, Renault Mégane barely noticeable takes the win – 446 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mercedes EQA proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mercedes EQA is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £44,200
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes EQA
Renault Mégane
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQA
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Renault Mégane
The Renault Mégane blends Gallic flair with practical everyday charm, showing that sensible transport can still have personality and poise. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want a comfortable, stylish hatchback that feels a little more special than the usual commute companion.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
Mercedes EQA
Renault Mégane
|
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
44200 - 57400 £
|
Price
35100 - 38500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.40 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
Electric Range
452 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
|
Curb weight
1719 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
389 L
|
|
Length
4463 mm
|
Length
4200 mm
|
|
Width
1834 mm
|
Width
1783 mm
|
|
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
|
Height
1505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1332 L
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
446 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.40 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.