VS

Mercedes EQA vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (228 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 69,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Volvo ES90?

Mercedes EQA vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Volvo ES90

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes EQA is substantially cheaper – starting at 45,900 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 69,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,060 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo ES90 is barely more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQA. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 706 km, about 230 km more than the Mercedes EQA.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 452 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers considerably more torque with 870 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 480 Nm more.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQA is clearly lighter – 2,115 kg compared to 2,610 kg. The difference is around 495 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo ES90 carries only slightly more – 460 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £69,900
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 456 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 km
Mercedes EQA
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
Mercedes EQA
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Price
69,900 - 74,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
476 km
Electric Range
706 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Curb weight
2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
228 HP
Power HP
456 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
390 Nm
Torque
670 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
168 kW
Power kW
335 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.