Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQA vs Volvo XC60 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (292 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (44200 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Volvo XC60?
EQA
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQA has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 44200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4954 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA performs decisively better – achieving up to 561 km, about 479 km more than the Volvo XC60.
XC60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 455 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 6 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC60 performs slightly better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls noticeable stronger with 709 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 189 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
EQA
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is barely noticeable lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2045 kg. The difference is around 145 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers distinct more room – 483 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 143 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs somewhat better – up to 1543 L, which is about 223 L more than the Mercedes EQA.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 clearly perceptible takes the win – 550 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mercedes EQA shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £44,200
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes EQA
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQA
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
Volvo XC60
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Mercedes EQA
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
44200 - 57400 £
|
Price
49200 - 75100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4463 mm
|
Length
4708 mm
|
|
Width
1834 mm
|
Width
1902 mm
|
|
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
|
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.