VS

Mercedes EQA vs VW ID.Polo comparison

Compare performance (228 HP vs 226 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or VW ID.Polo?

Mercedes EQA vs VW ID.Polo: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • barely more electric range
details

VW ID.Polo

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW ID.Polo is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,450 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the VW ID.Polo is clearly more efficient: consuming 13.3 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQA. That’s a difference of about 3.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers barely more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 22 km more than the VW ID.Polo.

ID.Polo

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers marginally more power – delivering 228 HP compared to 226 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.Polo is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers noticeably more torque with 390 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW ID.Polo is clearly lighter – 1,568 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 547 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW ID.Polo offers noticeably more boot space – 441 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW ID.Polo carries only slightly more – 444 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW ID.Polo is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
ID.Polo

VW ID.Polo

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 226 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.3 - 14.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 424 - 454 km
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.Polo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details

VW ID.Polo

The VW ID.Polo brings classic Polo sensibility to the EV age with a calm, refined ride, an unusually large boot, and refreshingly simple controls with real buttons. It favors easygoing efficiency and family-friendly practicality over playful handling or high-speed autobahn pace, and the smaller-battery versions ask for a bit more planning on long trips.

details
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.Polo

Costs and Consumption

Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Price
21,400 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.3 - 14.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
476 km
Electric Range
424 - 454 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Curb weight
1,568 - 1,635 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
441 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,816 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
444 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
228 HP
Power HP
116 - 226 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
390 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
168 kW
Power kW
85 - 166 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
VW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.