VS

Mercedes EQB vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (292 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQB or Mazda CX-6e?

Mercedes EQB vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Mercedes EQB

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-6e

  • very slightly cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQB

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-6e is very slightly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mercedes EQB costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,021 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQB is markedly more efficient: consuming 15.2 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 3.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQB offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 535 km, about 51 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQB offers somewhat more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQB is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.2 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQB delivers substantially more torque with 520 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.

EQB

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQB is only slightly lighter – 2,105 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 100 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQB offers only slightly more boot space – 495 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 27 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQB carries somewhat more – 435 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQB holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,900
EQB

Mercedes EQB

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 292 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.2 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 468 - 535 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Mercedes EQB
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQB

The Mercedes EQB is an electric compact SUV that dresses Mercedes' premium feel in practical clothing, with flexible seating and a serene, composed ride that turns everyday errands into a small luxury. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but for buyers who want a smart, spacious and well-made EV with tasteful tech and real-world usability, the EQB is a sensible, slightly buttoned-up choice that impresses without shouting.

details
21C0680_006
21C0680_005
21C0680_002
21C0680_078
21C0680_052

Reviews Mercedes EQB

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
Stefan
4 Dec 2025, 21:05:57

A bit boring and no longer up-to-date with its slow charging speed...

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Mercedes EQB
Mercedes GLB
VS
The Mercedes EQB and Mercedes GLB target the same compact‑SUV buyers but take very different routes: the EQB is the all‑electric choice while the GLB relies on conventional petrol/diesel and mild‑hybrid engines. This quick comparison looks at driving character, interior practicality, range and …
Kia EV5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Kia EV5 and Mazda CX-6e pits two fresh electric crossovers from established brands against each other, each promising a mix of range, tech and everyday practicality. This quick head-to-head will help you see which suits your driving needs and lifestyle better.
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
CUPRA Tavascan
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan and Mazda CX-6e offer distinct approaches to the electric crossover: the Tavascan leans into sporty performance and bold styling, while the CX-6e prioritizes Mazda’s refined design and everyday usability. This comparison focuses on driving dynamics, range and practicality to help …
Mercedes EQB
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,900 - 58,900 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 535 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,105 - 2,170 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
495 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
4,684 mm
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
1,654 - 1,689 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,710 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
435 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.2 - 8.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Mazda
Is the Mercedes EQB offered with different drivetrains?

The Mercedes EQB is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.