@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mercedes EQE vs Volvo XC40 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Two cars, one duel: Mercedes EQE meets Volvo XC40.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQE @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC40 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Mercedes EQE costs 57600 £. That’s a price difference of around 20826 £.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE has a significantly edge – offering 625 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 428 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 4.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQE performs to a small extent better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQE pulls significantly stronger with 950 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 650 Nm difference.

EQE @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is clearly lighter – 1688 kg compared to 2375 kg. The difference is around 687 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers hardly perceptible more room – 452 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQE a bit takes the win – 600 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mercedes EQE shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £57,600
EQE @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Mercedes EQE

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 265 - 625 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.8 - 20.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 502 - 691 km
details

Mercedes EQE

The Mercedes EQE glides like a silk-wrapped saloon from the future, pairing whisper-quiet refinement with a high-tech cabin that feels both modern and indulgent. For buyers who want electric luxury without shouting about it, the EQE is composed, comfortably confident, and just smug enough to feel special.

details
22C0201_011 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
22C0201_077 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
22C0203_003 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
22C0203_010 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
22C0201_064 @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Volvo XC40

5 (2)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Mercedes EQE
Volvo XC40
EQE @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
57600 - 94900 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 20.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
502 - 691 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
2375 - 2540 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4946 - 4964 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1961 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1492 - 1510 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
545 - 600 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
210 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda HR-V
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V stands out for its versatile cargo space and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those seeking …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQE?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.