Compare performance (585 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (80,900 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS or Volvo EX90?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the electric vehicle segment, two automakers known for their commitment to luxury and technology are steering their way into the future. Mercedes-Benz, with its EQS, and Volvo, with its EX90, present two distinct approaches to sustainable driving. This comparison delves into technical details and innovations that define these two flagship models for 2024.
The Mercedes EQS is a luxury hatchback that stretches out to 5223 mm in length, offering a sleek and aerodynamic design. With a width of 1926 mm and a range of heights from 1512 mm to 1520 mm, the EQS exudes a sense of elegance and sportiness. On the other hand, the Volvo EX90, an SUV, stands taller and broader at 1744 mm and 1964 mm respectively, with a length of 5037 mm, providing a more commanding presence on the road.
The Mercedes EQS comes with a versatile power range from 360 HP to a staggering 761 HP, thanks to its powerful electric drivetrain options. This provides drivers with the ability to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 3.4 seconds. The EQS is available in both all-wheel and rear-wheel drive, offering flexibility to suit different driving preferences. In contrast, the Volvo EX90 offers a solid performance range, starting from 279 HP to 517 HP. With acceleration capabilities reaching 0-100 km/h in 4.9 seconds, the EX90 also caters to the performance-oriented driver, albeit with a slightly reduced emphasis compared to the EQS.
Efficiency takes the spotlight as both vehicles are electric, boasting zero tailpipe emissions with a CO2 efficiency class of A. The EQS stands out with its potential electric range reaching up to 816 km and a consumption rate variably from 16.5 to 21 kWh/100km. In comparison, the EX90 offers a range between 580 km and 614 km, with a slightly higher consumption between 19.9 and 20.8 kWh/100km. The EQS’s larger battery capacity of 118 kWh allows for these extended ranges over the EX90’s maximum of 107 kWh.
Technology integration in the EQS mirrors the Mercedes-Benz legacy of innovation. It includes advanced driver-assistance systems and a cutting-edge infotainment experience with a high-tech interface that’s intuitive for users. Meanwhile, Volvo’s EX90, staying true to its safety-first philosophy, is equipped with the latest in safety technology, offering an array of sensors and safety-focused features that ensure the well-being of its occupants.
The EQS offers a luxurious experience with a spacious interior, comfortably seating five passengers. It provides a trunk capacity of 610 liters, demonstrating its practicality despite its sleek profile. The EX90, versatile with seating configurations for up to six passengers, ensures family-friendly functionality. However, it does have a smaller trunk capacity of 310 liters, emphasizing a focus on passenger accommodation over cargo space.
Both the Mercedes EQS and Volvo EX90 embody the future of automotive innovation with their clean electric drivetrains and advanced technology suites. The EQS caters to those seeking unparalleled luxury and range, while the EX90 sacrifices some range for a balance of safety and SUV practicality. Each vehicle offers unique virtues suited to different lifestyles, ensuring that whichever one you choose, the future of motoring holds something special.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo EX90 is a bit cheaper – starting at 72,200 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 80,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,754 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQS is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX90. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 920 km, about 300 km more than the Volvo EX90.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers somewhat more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 585 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Volvo EX90 takes 4.2 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers very slightly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQS is barely lighter – 2,550 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries marginally more – 605 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
The Volvo EX90 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.
details
The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
80,900 - 117,500 £
|
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
810 - 920 km
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,550 - 2,660 kg
|
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
610 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,926 mm
|
Width
1,964 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
545 - 570 kg
|
Payload
545 - 605 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
367 - 585 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
505 - 800 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
270 - 430 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España