VS

Mercedes EQT vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Honda CR-V?

Mercedes EQT vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
details

Honda CR-V

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQT

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mercedes EQT is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 40,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,426 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQT offers significantly more range – reaching up to 278 km, about 200 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V offers markedly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda CR-V is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers noticeably more torque with 335 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.

EQT

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is very slightly lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers somewhat more boot space – 617 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries somewhat more – 531 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQT is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,800
EQT

Mercedes EQT

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 265 - 278 km
Mercedes EQT
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
Mercedes EQT
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 531 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
132 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Honda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.