VS

Mercedes EQT vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or MG ZS?

Mercedes EQT vs MG ZS: Key differences

Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more trunk space
details

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQT

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG ZS is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Mercedes EQT costs 27,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,783 £.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers markedly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQT delivers visibly more torque with 245 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 97 Nm more.

EQT

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is considerably lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 595 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers slightly more boot space – 551 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 108 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries somewhat more – 531 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
Mercedes EQT
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details
23C0128_203_1
23C0128_111_1
23C0128_107_1
23C0128_006_0
23C0128_212_1

Reviews Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The MG ZS and the Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling without big running costs. The ZS undercuts with strong equipment and roomy cabin for the money, while the Yaris Cross prioritises refinement, hybrid efficiency and Toyota’s proven …
MG ZS
Opel Frontera
VS
The MG ZS and Opel Frontera make very different promises: the ZS is a modern, budget-friendly compact SUV focused on efficiency and daily comfort, while the Frontera is a more traditional, rugged SUV aimed at tougher terrain and towing. Below I’ll compare them across space, driving dynamics, …
MG ZS
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Captur brings together two popular small SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality, low running costs and modern equipment. I’ll cut through the marketing to show how they differ in space, comfort, driving feel, technology and running costs so you can choose the one …
Hyundai Kona
MG ZS
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the MG ZS are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling in a city-friendly package. The Kona leans toward sharper handling and a more refined drive, while the ZS competes on value and generous equipment—so your priorities for driving feel, features and budget will …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Opel Mokka
VS
Choosing between the MG ZS and the Opel Mokka comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward value and practicality or sharper styling and a more refined driving feel. Below I’ll compare their space, equipment, running costs and driving dynamics so you can pick the compact SUV that best …
MG ZS
Peugeot 2008
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Peugeot 2008 helps you weigh a value-focused, roomy compact SUV against a more stylish, composed rival with sharper handling and premium touches. This short guide highlights differences in space, equipment, driving feel and running costs so you can pick the one that …
Citroen C3 Aircross
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 Aircross and the MG ZS comes down to whether you want a quirky, comfort-focused small SUV with clever interior packaging or a straightforward, value-driven package with strong equipment levels. I’ll compare their ride, interior space, efficiency, safety tech and …
Mercedes EQT
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 531 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
132 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQT have?

The Mercedes EQT is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.