VS

Mercedes GLC EQ vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (489 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (61,100 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLC EQ or Mazda CX-6e?

Mercedes GLC EQ vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-6e

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

GLC EQ

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-6e is substantially cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mercedes GLC EQ costs 61,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,250 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes GLC EQ is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers markedly more range – reaching up to 714 km, about 230 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers clearly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 231 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC EQ is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC EQ delivers significantly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 510 Nm more.

GLC EQ

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-6e is slightly lighter – 2,205 kg compared to 2,535 kg. The difference is around 330 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC EQ offers a bit more boot space – 570 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLC EQ carries visibly more – 505 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC EQ is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £61,100
GLC EQ

Mercedes GLC EQ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 645 - 714 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mercedes GLC EQ
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes GLC EQ

The Mercedes GLC EQ brings an electrified touch to Mercedes’ compact luxury SUV line, combining a quiet, refined ride with the comfort and polish you expect from the brand. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want premium materials and everyday practicality while reducing fuel use, though it leans more toward comfort than sporty handling.

details
mercedes-glc-eq-2025
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (3)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (4)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (1)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (2)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (5)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (6)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (7)
mercedes-glc-eq-2025 (8)

Reviews Mercedes GLC EQ

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Hannu
22 May 2026, 10:40:59

It looks like a Mercedes‑Benz and not a bar of soap. Rear space has improved. Air suspension. Luxurious materials. Great dashboard and display.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:11:19

Aesthetic presence, good electric range and usable cargo hold...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:02:43

Great range, good looking, and virtually zero maintenance compare to the Range Rover which is the highest mainstream maintenance vehicle presently on the road..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Peter
27 Jul 2026, 17:46:47

Quality is a top priority at Mazda. No engine problems like with some other manufacturers in the past. Why should it be any different as an electric car.
The equipment focuses on the essentials… Great battery..
Visually very nice…
Will shake up the upper echelons of the car market at that price..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
Volvo EX60
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX60 and the Mercedes GLC EQ pairs Volvo’s minimalist, safety-first electric SUV with Mercedes’ luxury-focused, tech-rich take on the midsize EV crossover. I'll highlight the key differences in driving dynamics, range, interior quality and running costs so you can choose the one …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
XPeng G9
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
XPeng G9 and the Mercedes GLC (sold in electrified form as the GLC EQ) are competing as premium compact SUVs for buyers who want a blend of tech, range and comfort. The G9 brings bold EV technology and a high-tech, spacious cabin from a relative newcomer, while the GLC EQ leans on Mercedes’ …
Skoda Enyaq
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Mazda CX-6e go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Enyaq or the Mazda …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Kia EV3
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Choosing between the Kia EV3 and the Mazda CX-6e comes down to what you value most — practicality, range and efficiency, or driving engagement and a more premium cabin. The EV3 leans toward efficient electric practicality and strong value, while the CX-6e emphasizes Mazda’s signature driving …
Mercedes GLC EQ
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
61,100 - 70,600 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
645 - 714 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,535 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,913 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
489 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
800 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
360 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes GLC EQ have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.