VS

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Suzuki Swift comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (57,500 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or Suzuki Swift?

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Suzuki Swift: Key differences

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • clearly more power
details

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marco Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Swift is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,343 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers clearly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 155 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers substantially more torque with 500 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 388 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Suzuki Swift offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is considerably lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 1,381 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries significantly more – 650 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 354 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Swift is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Swift

Suzuki Swift

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 82 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Ignis and the Swift boils down to whether you want a feisty, high-riding city crossover with extra practicality or a more composed, sportier hatch with sharper handling. The Ignis stands out for its compact SUV character and clever packaging, while the Swift delivers a peppier …
Mercedes Marco Polo
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details
serpimg_rTvtWU

Reviews Mercedes Marco Polo

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prioritise interior space and everyday practicality or a punchy, fun-to-drive hatchback with lower running costs. The Jazz is prized for its flexible cabin and comfortable urban manners, while the Swift offers sharper …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to whether you want a nimble city hatchback or a roomier compact SUV. The Swift excels with light steering, efficient running costs and easy parking, while the Vitara offers higher seating, more cargo space and light off-road …
Nissan Juke
Suzuki Swift
VS
Nissan Juke and Suzuki Swift go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Dacia Sandero
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Suzuki Swift are two sensible choices in the small-car segment that take different approaches: the Sandero emphasizes no‑frills value and space, while the Swift aims for sharper handling and a more polished feel. This comparison will focus on practicality, running costs, …
Fiat 500
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Fiat 500 and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prefer retro Italian charm and compact city style or a more practical, versatile hatchback with sharper handling. This comparison looks at space, fuel economy, driving feel, equipment and running costs to help you decide …
SEAT Ibiza
Suzuki Swift
VS
SEAT Ibiza and Suzuki Swift go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and the Toyota Yaris means weighing the Swift’s playful handling and sporty styling against the Yaris’s refined ride and fuel efficiency. This short comparison focuses on what matters to everyday buyers — driving feel, space, running costs and reliability — so you …
Mercedes Marco Polo
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
194 - 218 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Bus
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Trunk capacity
670 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
5,140 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
1,975 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
555 - 650 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Mercedes Marco Polo?

The Mercedes Marco Polo is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.