Compare performance (131 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (23,000 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes T Class or Ford Transit Transporter?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes T Class is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 44,342 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 138 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes T-Class dresses everyday practicality in a premium suit, blending the sensible utility of a small van with the refinement you expect from the three-pointed star. Its flexible interior and clever details make it a brilliantly pragmatic choice for families and active owners who want comfort and usefulness without the fuss.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,000 - 30,500 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 7.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
135 - 167 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,556 - 1,678 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
521 - 630 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 15.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Ford
|