Compare performance (237 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (36,300 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Bus or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Mercedes Vito Bus costs 36,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,890 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van uses 5.1 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Bus with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is significantly more efficient: consuming 18.7 kWh/100km compared to 26.7 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Vito Bus. That’s a difference of about 8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers clearly more range – reaching up to 370 km, about 80 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers substantially more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is noticeably faster – reaching 176 km/h, while the Mercedes Vito Bus tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Bus delivers considerably more torque with 500 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mercedes Vito Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is markedly lighter – 1,493 kg compared to 2,023 kg. The difference is around 530 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers barely more capacity – up to 4,990 L, about 90 L more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Bus carries a bit more – 1,077 kg compared to 901 kg. That’s a difference of about 176 kg.
The Mercedes Vito Bus holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Vito is a sturdy, no-nonsense people carrier that blends commercial practicality with a surprisingly civilised cabin, making long shuttles feel less like a chore. If you need a dependable transporter that swallows luggage, forgives hard use and still looks a touch more premium than a plain van, the Vito is an easy, sensible pick.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,300 - 55,900 £
|
Price
22,400 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 10 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
248 - 370 km
|
Electric Range
270 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 228 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
8
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,023 - 2,739 kg
|
Curb weight
1,493 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
580 - 1,390 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,895 - 5,370 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,910 mm
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
1,890 mm
|
Height
1,854 - 1,864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
4,190 - 4,990 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,900 L
|
|
Payload
726 - 1,077 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
330 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|