Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Volvo XC90 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (237 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (28800 £ vs 69800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Volvo XC90?
Vito Transporter
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes Vito Transporter has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28800 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40980 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC90 manages with 3.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.80 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs decisively better – achieving up to 474 km, about 403 km more than the Volvo XC90.
XC90
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a decisively edge – offering 455 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 218 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC90 performs distinct better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes Vito Transporter tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls evident stronger with 709 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 209 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is hardly perceptible lighter – 1916 kg compared to 2080 kg. The difference is around 164 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs significantly better – up to 6600 L, which is about 4744 L more than the Volvo XC90.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes Vito Transporter somewhat takes the win – 884 kg compared to 710 kg. That’s a difference of about 174 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mercedes Vito Transporter shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £28,800
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes Vito Transporter
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details
Volvo XC90
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28800 - 51600 £
|
Price
69800 - 84600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1916 - 2518 kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
4895 - 5390 mm
|
Length
4953 mm
|
|
Width
1928 mm
|
Width
1923 mm
|
|
Height
1910 - 1945 mm
|
Height
1771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 6600 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
|
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1950 - 1999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drive types are available for the Mercedes Vito Transporter?
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is available as Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.