VS

MG HS vs Lynk & Co 08 comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 48,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG HS or Lynk & Co 08?

MG HS vs Lynk & Co 08: Key differences

MG HS

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • visibly lighter

Lynk & Co 08

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • only slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

HS

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG HS is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Lynk & Co 08 costs 48,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,004 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG HS uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Lynk & Co 08 with 0.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 08 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 200 km, about 100 km more than the MG HS.

08

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 08 offers clearly more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 6.8 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

HS

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is visibly lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 2,112 kg. The difference is around 377 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lynk & Co 08 offers only slightly more boot space – 540 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 33 L.

When it comes to payload, the Lynk & Co 08 carries slightly more – 500 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG HS holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
HS

MG HS

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 224 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Seal U
MG HS
VS
Fresh from BYD’s EV revolution, the sleek Seal U brings range, tech and bold styling to spar with the MG HS/EHS — MG’s faithful family crossover offered as a petrol and a plug‑in hybrid that plays the safe, sensible card. Which one gives you the best mix of space, running costs and grin‑per‑mile?
Kia Sportage
MG HS
VS
Two likeable compact crossovers go head-to-head: the well-rounded Kia Sportage versus the value-packed MG HS and its electrified twin, the EHS. Which wins on everyday practicality, kit and style — and which one is the clever buy for your driveway and wallet?
MG HS
Lynk & Co 08

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Lynk & Co 08

The Lynk & Co 08 represents a bold leap in automotive design, merging a sleek and modern exterior with a spacious and tech-savvy interior that caters to the needs of contemporary drivers. Its innovative approach to connectivity and user experience sets it apart in a crowded market, offering drivers an unparalleled level of interaction and customization. With a strong focus on sustainability, this model features advanced hybrid technology, underscoring Lynk & Co's commitment to eco-friendly driving solutions.

details
578822-LYNKCO_08EU_HERO_front-582ddc-original-1740402629
578826-LYNKCO_08EU_profile-158bff-original-1740403371
578824-LYNKCO_08EU_rear-eccb64-original-1740403367
589446-LYNKCO_08EU_54-4f9f19-original-1746636059

Reviews Lynk & Co 08

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
BYD Seal U
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The BYD Seal U feels like a sleek, tech‑forward EV with impressive performance-to-price ratio, while the Lynk & Co 08 plays the role of bold, spacious SUV that prioritizes comfort and presence. If you want sporty agility and cutting‑edge battery tech, go Seal U; if you need family practicality, …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG HS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The Lynk & Co 01 and Lynk & Co 08 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Citroen C5 Aircross
MG HS
VS
The Citroen C5 Aircross and MG HS compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Nissan Qashqai
MG HS
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and MG HS compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
ZEEKR 7X
Lynk & Co 08
VS
ZEEKR 7X arrives like a tech-startup in SUV clothing — taut lines, a minimalist interior and a cockpit that screams "future", while the Lynk & Co 08 plays the confident road mate with chunkier styling, roomier practicality and a comfort-first setup. On the road the ZEEKR feels sharper and more …
MG HS
Lynk & Co 08

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Price
48,000 - 51,400 £
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
100 km
Electric Range
200 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
14 - 126 g/km
co2
23 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Curb weight
2,112 kg
Trunk capacity
507 L
Trunk capacity
540 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,915 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
400 kg
Payload
500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Power HP
350 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Power kW
257 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
MG
Brand
Lynk & Co
What drivetrain options does the MG HS have?

The MG HS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.