Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
MG Marvel R vs NIO ET5 comparison
Compare performance (288 HP vs 490 HP), boot space and price (40,300 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Marvel R or NIO ET5?
MG Marvel R vs NIO ET5: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Marvel R
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG Marvel R is barely cheaper – starting at 40,300 £ , while the NIO ET5 costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 437 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the NIO ET5 is barely more efficient: consuming 18.6 kWh/100km compared to 19.4 kWh/100km for the MG Marvel R. That’s a difference of about 0.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the NIO ET5 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 590 km, about 188 km more than the MG Marvel R.
ET5
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET5 offers significantly more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 288 HP. That’s roughly 202 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET5 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the MG Marvel R takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 200 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO ET5 delivers only slightly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 665 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm more.
Marvel R
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG Marvel R is clearly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,215 kg. The difference is around 405 kg.
Looking at boot space, the NIO ET5 offers very slightly more boot space – 386 L compared to 357 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.
For maximum load capacity, the MG Marvel R offers somewhat more capacity – up to 1,396 L, about 261 L more than the NIO ET5.
When it comes to payload, the MG Marvel R carries very slightly more – 478 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The NIO ET5 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £40,700
NIO ET5
MG Marvel R
NIO ET5
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MG Marvel R
The MG Marvel R combines striking, futuristic styling with a surprisingly spacious, gadget-packed cabin, giving shoppers a sharply styled electric alternative that punches above its price. It may not carry luxury-badge prestige, but it delivers honest daily usability and enough charisma to tempt buyers who want electric flair without the premium tax.
details
NIO ET5
NIO ET5 arrives with sleek, minimalist lines and a cabin that feels more like a calm lounge than a dashboard, delivering a composed drive that keeps motorway monotony at bay. Tech is smart rather than showy, and the brand’s novel ownership options make it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric convenience without the usual headaches — plus it brings enough personality to make charging stops less boring.
details
MG Marvel R
NIO ET5
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,300 - 43,700 £
|
Price
40,700 - 58,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.6 - 18.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
370 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
456 - 590 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
66.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 1,920 kg
|
Curb weight
2,215 - 2,235 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
357 L
|
Trunk capacity
386 L
|
|
Length
4,674 mm
|
Length
4,790 mm
|
|
Width
1,919 mm
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
|
Height
1,613 mm
|
Height
1,499 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,396 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,135 L
|
|
Payload
453 - 478 kg
|
Payload
455 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
180 - 288 HP
|
Power HP
490 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
410 - 665 Nm
|
Torque
700 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
132 - 212 kW
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2021
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
NIO
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.