VS

MG Marvel R vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (288 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (40,300 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Marvel R or Nissan Juke?

MG Marvel R vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

MG Marvel R

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Nissan Juke

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marvel R

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Juke is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the MG Marvel R costs 40,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,892 £.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Marvel R offers significantly more power – delivering 288 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Marvel R is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 5.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Marvel R delivers significantly more torque with 665 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 465 Nm more.

Marvel R

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is significantly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 536 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers moderately more boot space – 422 L compared to 357 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG Marvel R carries a bit more – 478 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Marvel R holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,300
Marvel R

MG Marvel R

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 180 - 288 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 370 - 402 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
VW Taigo
VS
The Nissan Juke and the VW Taigo pit two small crossovers against each other — one with bold, quirky character and lively handling, the other with understated styling and a more conventional, roomy interior. This quick comparison will help you decide whether you value personality and agility (Juke) …
MG Marvel R
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG Marvel R

The MG Marvel R combines striking, futuristic styling with a surprisingly spacious, gadget-packed cabin, giving shoppers a sharply styled electric alternative that punches above its price. It may not carry luxury-badge prestige, but it delivers honest daily usability and enough charisma to tempt buyers who want electric flair without the premium tax.

details
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_01
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_03
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_09
Marvel-R-hero-back
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_08
Marvel-R-steering-wheel
Marvel-R-frunk

Reviews MG Marvel R

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Robin Prins
21 Feb 2026, 06:26:34

Nice-handling SUV. Steers much more sharply than my previous SUV, a Lynk & Co 01. Has almost the same options as the Lynk. I wanted fully electric, though. The Marvel has a realistic range. So far it has never shown the WLTP figure of 402. But whatever it shows, it achieves. And I've experienced that very differently before (Lynk & Co 01 and Mazda MX-30). In short, a very good, comfortable EV. Downsides: abrupt steering corrections and annoying warning beeps. These can be switched off, but you have to do it every time. It's also a shame that the otherwise great navigation has no Dutch voice.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
Michel
10 Sept 2026, 20:47:11

Nice car, Kuga from 2020, without too many bells and whistles. Average consumption 1:19, with two-thirds of the trips between 7 and 15 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Ford Focus
Nissan Juke
VS
The Ford Focus and the Nissan Juke take very different approaches to the compact segment: the Focus focuses on balanced driving dynamics, practicality and refined handling, while the Juke trades conventional packaging for bold styling, higher ride height and city-friendly presence. Choose the Focus …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Kia Stonic
Nissan Juke
VS
Kia Stonic and Nissan Juke go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Dacia Sandero
Nissan Juke
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Nissan Juke both aim at buyers wanting compact, city-friendly cars, but they take very different approaches: the Sandero focuses on affordability and practical simplicity, while the Juke leans into distinctive styling and a more dynamic feel. This comparison will help you …
Nissan Juke
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Nissan Juke and Nissan Qashqai represent two distinct approaches to the crossover market, appealing to different drivers with their unique designs and features. While the Juke boasts a bold, sporty aesthetic and agile handling, the Qashqai prioritizes practicality and comfort, making it a …
MG Marvel R
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,300 - 43,700 £
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
370 - 402 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
66.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,810 - 1,920 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
357 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
4,674 mm
Length
-
Width
1,919 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
1,613 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,396 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 478 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
180 - 288 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
410 - 665 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
132 - 212 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2021
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
MG
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the MG Marvel R have?

The MG Marvel R is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.