Compare performance (194 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Mitsubishi Colt?
In the ever-competitive hatchback market, the MG MG3 and Mitsubishi Colt are two contenders that offer unique character and performance. Both vehicles are designed to cater to families and urban commuters alike, boasting a blend of practicality, efficiency, and modern features. In this comparison, we will delve into their technical specifications and innovations to help buyers make an informed choice.
Both the MG3 and the Mitsubishi Colt present a compact hatchback design ideal for city driving. The MG3 measures 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1502 mm in height, making it slightly larger than the Colt, which measures 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and 1439 mm in height. This difference provides the MG3 with a bit more room for passengers and luggage, featuring a trunk capacity of 293 liters compared to the Colt’s 301 liters, although the Colt offers more space when the rear seats are folded down.
The MG3 offers a range of engine choices, including a powerful full hybrid and petrol engines with outputs of 116 HP and 194 HP. With a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of as low as 8 seconds, it provides a spirited driving experience. The Mitsubishi Colt, on the other hand, offers a broader spectrum with options of engines ranging from 67 HP to 143 HP. While the Colt can also achieve an impressive 0-100 km/h in just 9.3 seconds with its more powerful variant, it sacrifices some acceleration for enhanced fuel efficiency, maintaining a consumption figure as low as 4.2 L/100 km.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the MG3 shines with a consumption range of 4.4 to 6.1 L/100 km, depending on the engine choice. Its CO2 emissions are equally commendable, with values around 100 g/km, placing it in class C for efficiency. The Mitsubishi Colt offers similar efficiency figures, with the most economical engine emitting as low as 96 g/km, making it class C certified as well. However, the Colt's range can vary significantly with different engines, and some variants fall into class D, which reflects a less competitive standing relative to the MG3.
Both models offer various transmission options, including manual and automatic gearboxes. The MG3 features both automatic and manual options, ensuring versatility for different driving preferences. Similarly, the Colt provides drivers with a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. Both vehicles are front-wheel drive, providing solid traction and control on urban roads.
Inside the MG3, buyers can expect a well-equipped cabin that focuses on user experience. The 2024 model incorporates modern infotainment options, including smartphone integration, a touchscreen interface, and various comfort features for all passengers. The Mitsubishi Colt, especially in its latest variants, has also made significant strides in interior design, integrating modern amenities and an intuitive dashboard layout. Both hatchbacks accommodate up to five passengers comfortably, making them suitable for small families or groups.
Safety is a paramount consideration in today's automotive landscape. The MG3 is built with essential safety features, including multiple airbags, ABS, and electronic stability control. The Colt similarly focuses on safety with a comprehensive array of features, often emphasizing advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) in higher trims. As both brands push toward improved safety ratings, potential buyers should consider the specific model year’s safety performance ratings.
In conclusion, the choice between the MG MG3 and Mitsubishi Colt ultimately depends on individual preferences in power, efficiency, and interior features. The MG3 offers robust performance with competitive efficiency and space, while the Mitsubishi Colt appeals with its varied engine options and excellent fuel economy. Whichever model you choose, both hatchbacks promise a mix of practicality and excitement for urban commuting.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG MG3 is slightly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Mitsubishi Colt costs 18,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,742 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the MG MG3 with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers clearly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 51 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi Colt delivers very slightly more torque with 160 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is very slightly lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,237 kg. The difference is around 48 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG MG3 carries slightly more – 448 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
The MG MG3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,053 mm
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,439 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
|
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España