Compare performance (194 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (15400 £ vs 21100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Renault Captur?
When it comes to choosing a compact car, both the MG3 and Renault Captur offer compelling options. However, they cater to slightly different audiences and driving needs. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations of these two intriguing vehicles.
The MG3 is a classic hatchback, designed for urban agility and ease of parking. It measures 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and stands at 1502 mm in height. On the other hand, the Renault Captur embraces an SUV body style, offering a higher stance with dimensions of 4239 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height. The extra height and length of the Captur might appeal to those seeking a slightly more commanding view of the road.
The MG3 provides choice with its Full Hybrid and Petrol options, offering a power output of up to 194 HP and 116 HP respectively. With a sprightly acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds, it is paired with an automatic or manual gearbox, suitable for different driving preferences. The top speed clocks in at 170 km/h.
In contrast, the Renault Captur showcases a diverse range of engine types, including Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, and LPG, with power ranging from a modest 91 HP to a robust 158 HP. It employs multiple transmission options, including a dual-clutch automatic, maintaining competitive performance with an acceleration range of 8.5 to 14.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Captur’s top speed varies slightly depending on the engine, peaking at 180 km/h.
Focusing on fuel economy, the hybrid MG3 shines with a consumption rate of just 4.4 L/100 km. Its petrol counterpart consumes slightly more at 6.1 L/100 km, aligning with a CO2 efficiency class of C or E, based on the configuration. It emits between 100 and 137 g/km of CO2, showcasing its eco-conscious design.
Renault Captur offers efficient choices as well, with its hybrid model consuming 4.7 L/100 km, and other engines ranging up to 7.8 L/100 km. It reflects CO2 efficiency classes of C or D, with emissions spanning from 106 to 139 g/km.
For practicality, the MG3 offers a trunk capacity of 293 liters, while the Renault Captur provides between 326 and 422 liters, depending on the configuration, ensuring generous space for family adventures. The MG3 carries a payload capacity of 448 kg against the Captur's range of 372 to 383 kg, depending on the model.
Both models comfortably seat five passengers. The MG3's straightforward, pragmatic interior contrasts with the Captur's more elevated SUV interior experience, which may appeal to those looking for a touch of sophistication alongside practicality.
In the MG3, we find a compact, efficiently performing hatchback, ideal for city dwellers and those who prize maneuverability and efficiency. Meanwhile, the Renault Captur targets individuals desiring the elevated view and spaciousness of an SUV, combined with versatile engine options.
Ultimately, the perfect choice depends on personal priorities: whether it's the sporty, economic drive of the MG3 or the versatile, elevated comfort of the Renault Captur, each vehicle has its own unique strengths in the compact car segment.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG MG3 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £ , while the Renault Captur costs 21100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5708 £.
Both cars consume an average of 4.40 L per 100 km – no difference here.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 has a somewhat edge – offering 194 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Captur pulls decisively stronger with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MG MG3 is minimal lighter – 1237 kg compared to 1323 kg. The difference is around 86 kg.
When it comes to payload, Renault Captur slight takes the win – 453 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
The MG MG3 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15400 - 21400 £
|
Price
21100 - 28400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1237 - 1285 kg
|
Curb weight
1323 - 1441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4239 mm
|
|
Width
1797 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1363 L
|
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1490 - 1495 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Renault
|
The MG MG3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España