Compare performance (194 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Renault Captur?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to choosing a compact car, both the MG3 and Renault Captur offer compelling options. However, they cater to slightly different audiences and driving needs. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations of these two intriguing vehicles.
The MG3 is a classic hatchback, designed for urban agility and ease of parking. It measures 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and stands at 1502 mm in height. On the other hand, the Renault Captur embraces an SUV body style, offering a higher stance with dimensions of 4239 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height. The extra height and length of the Captur might appeal to those seeking a slightly more commanding view of the road.
The MG3 provides choice with its Full Hybrid and Petrol options, offering a power output of up to 194 HP and 116 HP respectively. With a sprightly acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds, it is paired with an automatic or manual gearbox, suitable for different driving preferences. The top speed clocks in at 170 km/h.
In contrast, the Renault Captur showcases a diverse range of engine types, including Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, and LPG, with power ranging from a modest 91 HP to a robust 158 HP. It employs multiple transmission options, including a dual-clutch automatic, maintaining competitive performance with an acceleration range of 8.5 to 14.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Captur’s top speed varies slightly depending on the engine, peaking at 180 km/h.
Focusing on fuel economy, the hybrid MG3 shines with a consumption rate of just 4.4 L/100 km. Its petrol counterpart consumes slightly more at 6.1 L/100 km, aligning with a CO2 efficiency class of C or E, based on the configuration. It emits between 100 and 137 g/km of CO2, showcasing its eco-conscious design.
Renault Captur offers efficient choices as well, with its hybrid model consuming 4.7 L/100 km, and other engines ranging up to 7.8 L/100 km. It reflects CO2 efficiency classes of C or D, with emissions spanning from 106 to 139 g/km.
For practicality, the MG3 offers a trunk capacity of 293 liters, while the Renault Captur provides between 326 and 422 liters, depending on the configuration, ensuring generous space for family adventures. The MG3 carries a payload capacity of 448 kg against the Captur's range of 372 to 383 kg, depending on the model.
Both models comfortably seat five passengers. The MG3's straightforward, pragmatic interior contrasts with the Captur's more elevated SUV interior experience, which may appeal to those looking for a touch of sophistication alongside practicality.
In the MG3, we find a compact, efficiently performing hatchback, ideal for city dwellers and those who prize maneuverability and efficiency. Meanwhile, the Renault Captur targets individuals desiring the elevated view and spaciousness of an SUV, combined with versatile engine options.
Ultimately, the perfect choice depends on personal priorities: whether it's the sporty, economic drive of the MG3 or the versatile, elevated comfort of the Renault Captur, each vehicle has its own unique strengths in the compact car segment.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG MG3 is markedly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Renault Captur costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,965 £.
Both cars consume an average of 4.4 L/100km – no difference here.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers slightly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers substantially more torque with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is very slightly lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 86 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers visibly more boot space – 422 L compared to 293 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries very slightly more – 453 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
The MG MG3 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
Price
21,400 - 28,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
293 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España