Compare performance (158 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21,100 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or VW T-Roc?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Renault Captur and the VW T-Roc are standout models that promise a blend of performance, innovation, and style. Both offer the versatility and practicality that modern drivers demand, making the choice between them a challenging one. Here, we delve into the technical aspects and unique features of these two automotive titans.
The 2024 model of the Renault Captur offers multiple engine types, including full hybrids, petrol mild hybrids, LPG, and pure petrol variants, ensuring a spectrum of options for diverse driving preferences. With power outputs ranging from 91 HP to 158 HP, and torque peaking at 270 Nm, the Captur promises a dynamic driving experience. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies from 8.5 seconds for the more powerful engines to 14.3 seconds for its less potent counterparts, with top speeds ranging between 168 km/h and 180 km/h.
Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers both petrol and diesel options with power ranging from 115 HP to an impressive 300 HP. Its top-performing variant reaches 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, making it a strong contender for those who crave speed. With its maximum speed capping at 250 km/h, the T-Roc stands out in terms of sheer performance, enhanced by torque ratings reaching up to 400 Nm.
The Renault Captur's hybrid options deliver low fuel consumption figures, with the most efficient recording 4.7 L/100 km and CO2 emissions starting at 106 g/km. This makes the Captur an attractive option for environmentally conscious drivers.
The T-Roc also shines with commendable efficiency, particularly in its diesel variants, achieving fuel consumption as low as 4.7 L/100 km and CO2 emissions from 125 g/km. However, the larger, more potent engines note higher emissions, which prospective buyers may need to consider.
Both SUVs offer comfortable seating for five, but the T-Roc edges out in practical space with a trunk capacity reaching up to 445 liters compared to the Captur's 422 liters. The Renault Captur measures 4,239 mm in length and 1,797 mm in width, whereas the T-Roc is slightly longer at 4,271 mm and marginally wider at 1,819 mm, potentially providing a roomier interior.
Technological innovation is a priority for both brands. The Captur offers a hybrid powertrain with a dedicated 0.6 kWh battery, promoting electric-assisted driving. Meanwhile, the T-Roc boasts advanced drivetrains with options for all-wheel drive, enhancing its versatility across different terrains. Volkswagen's dual-clutch automatic transmissions enable smoother shifts, accentuating the driving experience.
Choosing between the Renault Captur and the VW T-Roc depends largely on the buyer's priorities. If efficiency and eco-friendliness are high on your list, the Captur's hybrid options stand out. For those who value performance and dynamic driving, the T-Roc’s higher-powered engines and all-wheel-drive capability offer compelling advantages.
Ultimately, both the Renault Captur and the VW T-Roc showcase superb engineering and innovation, each with its unique strengths. Whether you prioritize spirited driving or reducing your ecological footprint, these compact SUVs deliver in spades, making either a worthwhile investment.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Captur is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,100 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,310 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur offers very slightly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.9 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers only slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is slightly lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 142 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers noticeably more boot space – 422 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 138 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries slightly more – 515 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.
The Renault Captur is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Captur is a compact crossover that punches above its weight for everyday life, with a versatile interior featuring a sliding rear bench and clever double‑floor boot, plus an intuitive Google‑powered infotainment that makes errands and commutes easier. It leans toward comfort and economy rather than sportiness, although larger wheels bring a firmer ride, rear visibility is limited and the safety rating isn’t class‑leading.
details
The VW T‑Roc feels noticeably more grown‑up than before, with a much nicer cabin, sensible physical controls and a calm, well‑insulated ride that makes long trips comfortable. It’s compact and city‑friendly with practical rear seating, but the sloping roofline reduces rear headroom and tempting options can quickly push the price up, so buyers after maximum space or a sporty feel may want to consider alternatives.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
4,239 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España