Compare performance (197 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or KGM Musso EV?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the KGM Musso EV costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,000 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers significantly more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 217 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the KGM Musso EV is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Musso EV delivers clearly more torque with 678 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 530 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is significantly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 835 kg.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso EV carries clearly more – 905 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 435 kg.
The KGM Musso EV stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.
detailsThe Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
443 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
805 - 905 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
KGM
|