Compare performance (197 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or MG MG3?
In the consistently evolving automotive landscape, the MG brand has carved a niche for itself, offering vehicles that combine style, performance, and value for money. Among its popular offerings, the MG3 hatchback and the MG ZS SUV stand out for different reasons. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of these two models, evaluating their technical specifications, innovations, and overall functionality.
The MG3 is a stylish hatchback, measuring 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1502 mm in height. Its compact size makes it perfect for urban driving while providing sufficient space for five passengers. On the other hand, the MG ZS, coming in as a robust SUV, offers greater dimensions, ranging from 4323 mm to 4430 mm in length and 1809 mm to 1818 mm in width, with a height of 1649 mm to 1635 mm. This means the ZS provides a more commanding road presence and added interior space, making it ideal for families or those needing extra cargo capacity.
Under the hood, the MG3 boasts a 1.5-liter full hybrid engine that produces a healthy 194 HP, coupled with an automatic gearbox. With a curb weight of 1285 kg, it achieves a respectable acceleration of 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds and a top speed of 170 km/h. Fuel efficiency is noteworthy with a consumption rate of 4.4 L/100 km, positioning the MG3 as a fuel-saving contender in its segment.
The MG ZS comes with several engine options, including electric and hybrid variations. Its most powerful variants boast outputs of up to 197 HP, paired with an automatic gearbox or a reduction gearbox in the electrics. While the ZS is somewhat heavier, with a curb weight ranging from 1380 kg to 1620 kg depending on the model, it still offers impressive acceleration figures between 8.6 to 8.7 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Additionally, it enjoys a slightly higher top speed of up to 175 km/h. The ZS's hybrid models offer a consumption rate between 5.0 and 5.1 L/100 km, enjoying a balance of performance and efficiency.
The driving dynamics of both vehicles showcase MG's commitment to providing an engaging experience. The MG3, with its smaller stature, delivers nimble handling and makes light work of city commutes. Its front-wheel drive enables agile maneuverability, but it may feel less commanding at higher speeds compared to an SUV.
In contrast, the MG ZS provides a more composed ride, particularly on longer journeys. Its SUV stature offers a higher driving position and additional stability. The available electric variants of the ZS promise a quieter operation and instant torque delivery, which can exhilarate the driving experience.
Inside, the MG3 offers a practical and functional cabin with modern touches. It comfortably seats five and has a trunk capacity of 293 liters, sufficient for everyday needs. Technology features include a user-friendly infotainment system that integrates smoothly with smartphones, ensuring entertainment and connectivity on the go.
The MG ZS steps up the game with a more premium feel and advanced technology integration. Depending on the variant, it features a larger infotainment system, more quality materials, and better safety features. The trunk is also more generous, with 443 to 448 liters of cargo space. The ZS's higher models even come fitted with driver-assist technologies that enhance safety and ease of driving.
As environmental consciousness grows, both MG models offer competitive emissions ratings. The MG3 has a CO2 output of 100 g/km, while the MG ZS's electric variants boast zero emissions, affirming MG's commitment to sustainability. The hybrid variants of the ZS also show impressive performance with low CO2 figures of 113 and 115 g/km.
Choosing between the MG3 and MG ZS ultimately requires considering personal needs and driving habits. The MG3 is an excellent choice for those seeking an economical and compact urban vehicle, while the MG ZS caters to those who desire a more spacious, versatile, and technologically advanced ride. Both models showcase MG's engineering prowess and commitment to delivering value across different segments, making them worthy contenders in today’s automotive market.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG MG3 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the MG ZS costs 18,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG MG3 uses 4.4 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers marginally more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 148 Nm.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is very slightly lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 93 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries marginally more – 470 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.
The MG MG3 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España