VS

MG ZS vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Mitsubishi ASX?

MG ZS vs Mitsubishi ASX: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG ZS is visibly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Mitsubishi ASX costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,771 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers a bit more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi ASX delivers markedly more torque with 245 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 97 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is very slightly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 34 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers only slightly more boot space – 484 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 41 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries only slightly more – 470 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,800
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
MG ZS
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Ford Puma
MG ZS
VS
When comparing the Ford Puma and the MG ZS, it’s clear that both models appeal to different segments of the compact SUV market. The Ford Puma impresses with its sporty handling and innovative interior design, making it a favorite for those seeking a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
MG ZS
Opel Frontera
VS
The MG ZS offers a modern, urban-friendly design and a tech-savvy interior, making it a comfortable and efficient choice for city driving. In contrast, the Vauxhall Frontera is renowned for its ruggedness and off-road capability, ideal for adventurous journeys on challenging terrains. While the MG …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Toyota Yaris Cross present compelling choices for consumers seeking style and versatility. The MG ZS impresses with its value-for-money proposition, spacious interior, and bold design, while the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a refined driving …
Citroen C3 Aircross
MG ZS
VS
Citroen C3 Aircross and MG ZS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
MG ZS
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
99 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
397 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
MG
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.