VS

MG ZS vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Mitsubishi Colt?

MG ZS vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Colt

  • noticeably more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS is only slightly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Mitsubishi Colt costs 18,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 171 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers markedly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi Colt delivers marginally more torque with 160 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is moderately lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 141 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MG ZS offers somewhat more boot space – 443 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 52 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries a bit more – 470 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The MG ZS and the Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling without big running costs. The ZS undercuts with strong equipment and roomy cabin for the money, while the Yaris Cross prioritises refinement, hybrid efficiency and Toyota’s proven …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
All-New COLT_003

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
MG ZS
Opel Mokka
VS
Choosing between the MG ZS and the Opel Mokka comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward value and practicality or sharper styling and a more refined driving feel. Below I’ll compare their space, equipment, running costs and driving dynamics so you can pick the compact SUV that best …
Jeep Avenger
MG ZS
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the MG ZS both aim at buyers wanting a small, practical SUV but take very different approaches. The Avenger is a compact, city-friendly Jeep with an electric drivetrain and rugged styling, while the MG ZS is a budget-focused small SUV offering spacious practicality and a choice …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
MG ZS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The MG ZS is the no-nonsense, value-packed compact SUV that gives you straightforward practicality and low running costs, while the MG MGS5 EV dials in electric refinement, sharper styling and longer range for drivers ready to swap petrol for a charging cable. If you want bang-for-buck, easy …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
Honda HR-V
MG ZS
VS
Honda HR‑V vs MG ZS — two popular small SUVs that aim at the same family and urban buyer, but take different approaches: the HR‑V focuses on refinement and long‑term dependability, while the MG ZS undercuts on price and packs in straight‑forward value. Below I compare the key points to help you …
MG ZS
Opel Frontera
VS
The MG ZS and Opel Frontera make very different promises: the ZS is a modern, budget-friendly compact SUV focused on efficiency and daily comfort, while the Frontera is a more traditional, rugged SUV aimed at tougher terrain and towing. Below I’ll compare them across space, driving dynamics, …
MG ZS
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
MG
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.