VS

MG ZS vs VW Amarok comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 240 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 43,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or VW Amarok?

MG ZS vs VW Amarok: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

VW Amarok

  • a bit more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the VW Amarok costs 43,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,246 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the VW Amarok with 8.6 L/100km. The difference is about 3.5 L/100km.

Amarok

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Amarok offers a bit more power – delivering 240 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the VW Amarok takes 8.8 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Amarok delivers clearly more torque with 600 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 452 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is considerably lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,262 kg. The difference is around 932 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Amarok carries clearly more – 983 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 513 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
MG ZS
VW Amarok

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

VW Amarok

The VW Amarok is a surprisingly refined pickup that blends rugged capability with car-like comfort, feeling equally at home on a worksite or a weekend escape. Practical, well‑mannered and a little bit charismatic, it’s a smart choice for buyers who need honest utility without sacrificing everyday drivability — and yes, it can be oddly addictive to drive.

details
_90A0562
_90A0707
_90A1157
_90A1365

Reviews VW Amarok

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Toyota Yaris Cross present compelling choices for consumers seeking style and versatility. The MG ZS impresses with its value-for-money proposition, spacious interior, and bold design, while the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a refined driving …
Citroen C3 Aircross
MG ZS
VS
Citroen C3 Aircross and MG ZS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Citroen C3 Aircross or …
Dacia Duster
MG ZS
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly SUVs, the Dacia Duster squares off against the MG ZS, each offering distinct charms. The Dacia Duster is renowned for its rugged durability and remarkable off-road capability, making it a favorite for those seeking adventure without breaking the bank. Meanwhile, the …
Hyundai Kona
MG ZS
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the MG ZS are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling in a city-friendly package. The Kona leans toward sharper handling and a more refined drive, while the ZS competes on value and generous equipment—so your priorities for driving feel, features and budget will …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
MG ZS
VW Amarok

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
43,200 - 64,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.6 - 10.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
226 - 270 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
2,262 - 2,423 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
5,350 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,910 mm
Height
-
Height
1,871 - 1,884 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
883 - 983 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
170 - 240 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8 - 11.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
405 - 600 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
125 - 177 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
MG
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.