VS

MG ZS vs VW Caddy comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or VW Caddy?

MG ZS vs VW Caddy: Key differences

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

VW Caddy

  • significantly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the VW Caddy costs 27,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,768 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 4.6 L/100km.

Caddy

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers markedly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the VW Caddy takes 11.4 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Caddy delivers substantially more torque with 320 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 172 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: VW Caddy offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is moderately lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 245 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Caddy carries visibly more – 710 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 240 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Caddy holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,800
Caddy

VW Caddy

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 116 - 121 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
VW Touran
VW Caddy
VS
If you want a car-like family MPV with a polished interior, refined ride and tidy handling, the VW Touran feels like the grown-up choice for daily driving and longer trips. But if practicality rules—max cargo, sliding doors and a no-nonsense, van-like toughness—the VW Caddy is the smarter pick for …
MG ZS
VW Caddy

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

VW Caddy

The VW Caddy is the Swiss-army knife of compact vans — practical, surprisingly refined, and ready to swap a weekend adventure for a grocery run without breaking a sweat. It’s user-friendly, comfortable enough for daily driving, and sensible for buyers who want utility with a dash of style and no drama.

details
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27320-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27309-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27313-ThenewCaddyLife

Reviews VW Caddy

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Proace City
VW Caddy
VS
The Toyota Proace City is the no-nonsense workhorse: cavernous load space, clever folding seats and Toyota’s bulletproof reputation, while the Volkswagen Caddy feels more grown-up behind the wheel with tighter steering and a nicer cabin. If budget and reliability are your priority grab the Proace …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Peugeot 5008
VW Caddy
VS
Comparing the Peugeot 5008 and the VW Caddy helps you choose between a family-focused SUV and a utilitarian compact van. The 5008 delivers roomy seating, a refined ride and SUV styling for family comfort, while the VW Caddy prioritizes cargo versatility, easy loading and practical durability for …
Citroen Berlingo
VW Caddy
VS
The Citroen Berlingo and VW Caddy compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
Ford Transit Connect
VW Caddy
VS
In the competitive segment of compact vans, the Ford Transit Connect and VW Caddy stand out for their practicality and versatility. The Transit Connect boasts a spacious interior and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for urban deliveries. Meanwhile, the VW Caddy offers a refined …
Ford Tourneo Connect
VW Caddy
VS
The Ford Tourneo Connect is the family-hauler of choice, with cavernous space, clever seating options and a cushioned ride that turns school runs into mini road trips. The VW Caddy, by contrast, is the sharper, more car-like pick — tidier to drive, more efficient and better bonded to the tarmac, …
MG ZS
MG HS
VS
The MG ZS and MG HS are closely related SUVs that target buyers seeking compact practicality and modern features without luxury-car prices. The ZS emphasises affordability and efficient urban use, while the HS offers more space, stronger engines and extra equipment, so your choice comes down to …
MG ZS
VW Caddy

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
27,800 - 45,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
116 - 121 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
10 - 165 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,998 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
1,819 - 1,860 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,556 - 3,700 L
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
501 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 14 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
173 - 186 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
Brand
MG
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.