Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs BYD Atto 2 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (258 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (25500 £ vs 27400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or BYD Atto 2?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MINI Aceman has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the BYD Atto 2 costs 27400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1963 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the BYD Atto 2 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 2 performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 430 km, about 25 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Atto 2
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman has a a bit edge – offering 258 HP compared to 212 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.50 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs somewhat better – reaching 200 km/h, while the BYD Atto 2 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Aceman pulls slightly stronger with 350 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, BYD Atto 2 is to a small extent lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1720 kg. The difference is around 210 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BYD Atto 2 offers distinct more room – 450 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 150 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BYD Atto 2 performs distinct better – up to 1340 L, which is about 335 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman hardly perceptible takes the win – 530 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
Who wins the race?
The MINI Aceman proves to be shows small but notable strengths and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MINI Aceman is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £25,500
MINI Aceman
MINI Aceman
BYD Atto 2
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MINI Aceman
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
BYD Atto 2
5 (1 Reviews)
The Atto 2 is making waves in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. This innovative model combines cutting-edge technology with captivating aesthetics, making it a standout choice for eco-conscious drivers. With its spacious interior and advanced features, the Atto 2 offers both comfort and convenience for everyday use.
details
MINI Aceman
BYD Atto 2
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
Price
27400 - 36000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 41 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 - 1720 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 - 450 L
|
|
Length
4079 mm
|
Length
4310 mm
|
|
Width
1754 mm
|
Width
1830 mm
|
|
Height
1514 mm
|
Height
1675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1340 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
260 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 310 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
BYD
|
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?
The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.