Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Peugeot 208 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (258 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (25500 £ vs 20700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Peugeot 208?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 208 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20700 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 25500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4775 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Peugeot 208 with 14.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 208 performs minimal better – achieving up to 432 km, about 27 km more than the MINI Aceman.
208
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman has a noticeable edge – offering 258 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Peugeot 208 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 200 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Aceman pulls evident stronger with 350 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot 208 is decisively lighter – 1165 kg compared to 1720 kg. The difference is around 555 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Peugeot 208 offers slightly more room – 352 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 52 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 208 performs slightly better – up to 1163 L, which is about 158 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman to a small extent takes the win – 530 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
MINI Aceman
Peugeot 208
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £25,500
MINI Aceman
MINI Aceman
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Peugeot 208
3 (1 Reviews)
The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.
details
MINI Aceman
Peugeot 208
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
Price
20700 - 35200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
362 - 432 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 117 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1165 - 1530 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
|
|
Length
4079 mm
|
Length
4055 mm
|
|
Width
1754 mm
|
Width
1745 mm
|
|
Height
1514 mm
|
Height
1430 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1118 - 1163 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
380 - 430 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, C
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?
The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.