VS

Ford Puma vs Peugeot 208 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 21,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot 208?

Ford Puma vs Peugeot 208: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Peugeot 208

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Ford Puma VS Peugeot 208: which small car suits your life?

The Ford Puma VS Peugeot 208 matchup pits a cheeky compact SUV against a stylish supermini, and the choice is less about specs and more about how you use the car. The Ford Puma projects a sporty, youthful persona with obvious practical thinking baked into its cargo area, while the Peugeot 208 leans on refined cabin feel and quiet composure. Buyers deciding between the Ford Puma and the Peugeot 208 will quickly feel this is a character clash: one wants to entertain behind the wheel, the other to seduce with quality and calm. Read on to see where each car earns the upper hand in everyday life and where the compromises bite.

208

Driving character and real-world usability

The Ford Puma is the one that makes cornering fun: sharp steering, eager turn-in and a chassis that rewards playful inputs, so drivers who like to feel connected will prefer the Puma. The Peugeot 208 answers with a lighter, more relaxed steering feel that suits busy streets and calm longer runs rather than aggressive driving. That contrast comes with trade-offs — the Puma’s liveliness can mean a firmer ride and a hint of three‑cylinder rasp at low revs, while the 208 prioritises a quieter, less intrusive cabin but never quite chases the same driver engagement. In short, the Puma is for those who want a small car that feels like a small hot hatch with SUV benefits; the 208 is for buyers who value serenity and easy manners in everyday traffic.

Puma

Comfort and long-distance behavior

On long runs the Peugeot 208 tends to feel more relaxed thanks to a generally quieter layout and a composed ride, so it will win favour with motorway miles and passengers who prize calm. The Ford Puma’s front seats are supportive and comfortable for long hours, but its suspension and sporty tuning—especially on certain trims—transmit sharper imperfections more readily. Both cars have tight rear seats, but the Puma’s rear can feel marginally more usable for short trips thanks to clever packaging, whereas the 208’s back row accentuates its hatchback proportions and can feel more cramped for taller adults. Ergonomically, the Puma’s touchscreen‑led controls make some functions less tactile, while the 208’s driver interface is distinctive and comfortable in many seats but can be polarising for visibility and reach.

208

City friendliness and practical day-to-day use

If you live in town the Peugeot 208’s compact footprint and nimble steering make parking and lane‑weaving easier, and its urban manners feel effortlessly polite. The Ford Puma trades a little of that tightness for a raised driving position and clever cargo touches that make loading bikes, sports gear or muddy boots less of a battle — its versatile boot area is a genuine daily benefit. Visibility in tight parking can work against the Puma because of thicker rear pillars, although cameras and sensors compensate; the 208’s smaller overall size and short turning circle are naturally handy where space is scarce. So in the city the 208 is the manoeuvrability pick, while the Puma is the practical, more flexible alternative if you carry things often.

Puma

Cabin feel, perceived quality and technology

The Peugeot 208 presents an interior that often feels a class above its price point, with tactile surfaces and a design that ages well, which will matter to buyers who prize perceived quality. The Ford Puma modernises the cockpit with big screens and up‑to‑date connectivity, but that digital push also removes some physical controls and leaves parts of the cabin feeling simpler in material finish. Technology works differently in each: the Puma’s infotainment is responsive and focused on connectivity, whereas the 208’s layout and trim choices create a more premium atmosphere despite occasional infotainment sluggishness. Buyers who want a plush, design‑forward interior will tilt to the 208; those who want the latest phone integration and a practical mindset will find the Puma more compelling.

208

Which buyer should favour which car — a quick fit guide

Choose the Ford Puma if you prioritise driving enjoyment, clever boot solutions and a bolder, youthful character that tolerates firmer ride and tighter rear space; it’s aimed at active singles, couples and small families who want a car that’s fun and useful. Opt for the Peugeot 208 if you prefer a quieter, more refined cabin, lower running fuss in mixed driving and a small footprint for dense urban use; it suits buyers who value perceived quality and economy over outright sportiness. Both cars make sensible compromises, so the final decision is personal: if you need the numbers on economy, performance and price to settle the trade-offs, the technical comparison that follows will lay those details out side‑by‑side.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Peugeot 208
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Peugeot 208 dazzles with sharp, French looks, a spritely turbocharged engine and an interior that punches above its class, making small-car fun feel slightly less small. The Toyota Yaris, meanwhile, trades flash for fortress-like reliability, class-leading hybrid economy and sensible safety …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot 208 is slightly cheaper – starting at 21,000 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,932 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 208 uses 4.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is very slightly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.1 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 208. That’s a difference of about 1.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot 208 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 432 km, about 15 km more than the Ford Puma.

208

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers marginally more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Peugeot 208 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers marginally more torque with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 208 is a bit lighter – 1,165 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 151 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more boot space – 523 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 171 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Peugeot 208

The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.

details
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP105
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP103
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP018
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP_300

Reviews Peugeot 208

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Labbe
21 Dec 2025, 15:16:45

Fuel consumption stated in the article — misleading. In town, on the highway, at least 7 L/100 km.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 208
Peugeot 308
VS
The Peugeot 208 is the cheeky city slicker — nimble, economical and perfect for tight streets and short trips — while the Peugeot 308 is the grown-up hatchback, offering more space, refinement and motorway composure. Pick the 208 for lively, budget-friendly urban driving; choose the 308 if you need …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Peugeot 208
CUPRA Raval
VS
Comparing the Peugeot 208 and the CUPRA Raval pits a refined, city-friendly hatch — the 208 — against CUPRA’s edgier, performance-focused Raval. I'll walk through the key differences in driving feel, efficiency, practicality and equipment so you can pick which one suits your needs.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Citroen C3
Peugeot 208
VS
Forget badge snobbery: the Citroën C3 is the comfy, quirky city car that soaks up potholes and prioritises practicality, while the Peugeot 208 feels sharper to drive with a more premium cabin and livelier engines. Pick the C3 for relaxed, characterful motoring and the 208 if you want style and …
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
21,000 - 33,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
363 - 432 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,165 - 1,530 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,745 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
380 - 430 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Peugeot
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.