Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Peugeot 208 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 20700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot 208?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 208 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4089 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 208 manages with 4.50 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Peugeot 208 with 14.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 208 performs slightly better – achieving up to 432 km, about 56 km more than the Ford Puma.
208
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a minimal edge – offering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Peugeot 208 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Peugeot 208 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls minimal stronger with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot 208 is to a small extent lighter – 1165 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 151 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 171 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 120 L more than the Peugeot 208.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma barely noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot 208 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £20,700
Peugeot 208
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Peugeot 208
3 (1 Reviews)
The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.
details
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
20700 - 35200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
362 - 432 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 117 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1165 - 1530 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4055 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1745 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1430 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1118 - 1163 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
380 - 430 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.