@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
VS

Ford Puma vs Peugeot 208 – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot 208?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma vs Peugeot 208: A Battle of Innovation and Efficiency

When it comes to choosing a compact vehicle that offers a blend of performance, efficiency, and modern technology, the Ford Puma and Peugeot 208 make for a compelling comparison. Both vehicles offer unique advantages and distinct features to appeal to a wide range of drivers. Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations of these two models to see which might align better with your automotive desires.

208 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Body and Design

The Ford Puma, with its SUV body type, provides a slightly elevated stance compared to the hatchback design of the Peugeot 208. With dimensions stretching up to 4226 mm in length, the Puma combines sporty aesthetics with practicality. The body design is both aerodynamic and stylish, fitting well within urban settings and open highways.

On the other hand, the Peugeot 208 adopts a more compact hatchback silhouette, measuring 4055 mm in length. This makes it highly maneuverable in tight urban environments. Its design is both chic and contemporary, catering to those who prefer a more traditional yet modern car structure.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Power and Performance

The Ford Puma offers a versatile range in its powertrain configurations, boasting petrol MHEV and electric options. With power outputs ranging from 125 to 168 HP, the Puma ensures dynamic performance with choices like a manual gearbox, dual-clutch automatic, or a reduction gearbox for the electric variant. Acceleration times from 0-100 km/h vary from 9.8 to an impressive 7.4 seconds, reflecting its sporty credentials.

In contrast, the Peugeot 208 is offered with petrol, petrol MHEV, and electric powertrains. Its power spectrum runs from 101 to 156 HP, paired with either an automatic or a manual gearbox. The 208 achieves 0-100 km/h in timings between 10.7 and 8.3 seconds, showcasing its reliable and efficient engineering.

208 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Efficiency and Range

Efficiency is a strong suit for both models. The Ford Puma achieves fuel consumption figures of 5.4 to 6 L/100 km in its petrol variants and offers an electric consumption rate between 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100 km. Its electric variant boasts a range of up to 376 km, providing excellent driving economy and reduced environmental impact.

The Peugeot 208 matches this strength with strong figures itself, presenting fuel consumption as low as 4.7 L/100 km. The electric versions of the 208 achieve 14 to 14.5 kWh/100 km with a range extending from 363 to an impressive 410 km, placing it as a significant contender in the electric vehicle space.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Technology and Innovation

Technology is at the forefront of both vehicles. Ford's innovative mild-hybrid technology in the Puma enhances both performance and fuel efficiency, along with various modern conveniences and driver-assistance systems that ensure safety and ease of use.

Peugeot 208, meanwhile, impresses with its i-Cockpit design, offering a futuristic and intuitive interior experience. The 208 is loaded with tech-savvy features, making connectivity and in-car technology a delight for tech enthusiasts.

208 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Peugeot 208 comes down to personal preference and specific needs. The Puma offers a more elevated SUV experience, promising powerful performance and efficiency, while the 208 provides a more compact, traditional hatchback that doesn't skimp on innovation or economy.

Ultimately, both cars serve as excellent examples of modern automotive engineering with unique advantages, catering to a wide array of driving preferences and scenarios.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot 208 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20700 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 4089 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 208 manages with 4.50 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Peugeot 208 with 14.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.

As for range, the Peugeot 208 performs slightly better – achieving up to 432 km, about 56 km more than the Ford Puma.

208 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a minimal edge – offering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Peugeot 208 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Peugeot 208 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls minimal stronger with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Peugeot 208 is to a small extent lighter – 1165 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 151 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 171 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 120 L more than the Peugeot 208.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma barely noticeable takes the win – 469 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Peugeot 208 proves to be barely ahead and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Peugeot 208 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £20,700
208 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Peugeot 208

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 101 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 5.2 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.1 - 15.4 kWh
  • Electric Range : 362 - 432 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Peugeot 208

The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.

details
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP105 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP103 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP018 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
PEUGEOT_208_1902STYP_300 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
208 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
20700 - 35200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
362 - 432 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 - 117 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
44 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1165 - 1530 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4055 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1745 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1430 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1118 - 1163 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
380 - 430 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
150 - 200 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Peugeot

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.