Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Tesla Model S - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (258 HP vs 1020 HP), boot space and price (25500 £ vs 94300 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Tesla Model S?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MINI Aceman has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £, while the Tesla Model S costs 94300 £. That’s a price difference of around 68820 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Tesla Model S with 16.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.80 kWh.
As for range, the Tesla Model S performs convincingly better – achieving up to 744 km, about 339 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Model S
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model S has a decisively edge – offering 1020 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 762 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model S is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.10 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.40 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model S performs noticeable better – reaching 322 km/h, while the MINI Aceman tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 122 km/h.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MINI Aceman is clearly perceptible lighter – 1720 kg compared to 2092 kg. The difference is around 372 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model S offers convincingly more room – 799 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 499 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Tesla Model S performs convincingly better – up to 1828 L, which is about 823 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman slightly takes the win – 530 kg compared to 442 kg. That’s a difference of about 88 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Tesla Model S shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £94,300
Tesla Model S
MINI Aceman
Tesla Model S
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Tesla Model S
4.7 (1 Reviews)
The Tesla Model S glides like a luxury sedan from the future, delivering instant shove and serene highway composure that make it feel equally at home on a rush-hour commute or a long-distance cruise. Inside, its minimalist cabin and gadget-forward interface turn every drive into a tech demo, making it as much a statement piece as a practical choice — and one that still manages to feel a little bit magical.
details
MINI Aceman
Tesla Model S
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
Price
94300 - 102800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 18 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
611 - 744 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
Curb weight
2092 - 2197 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
799 L
|
|
Length
4079 mm
|
Length
5021 mm
|
|
Width
1754 mm
|
Width
1987 mm
|
|
Height
1514 mm
|
Height
1431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1828 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
432 - 442 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
670 - 1020 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.1 - 3.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
240 - 322 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
493 - 750 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?
The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.